2022
The Personalization of Politics in the Council of the European Union and the European Council
HAMŘÍK, LukášZákladní údaje
Originální název
The Personalization of Politics in the Council of the European Union and the European Council
Název anglicky
The Personalization of Politics in the Council of the European Union and the European Council
Autoři
Vydání
UACES 2022 Annual Conference, Lille, 2022
Další údaje
Typ výsledku
Prezentace na konferencích
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ne
Klíčová slova anglicky
Personalization of politics, Institutional personalization of politics, Centralized and decentralized personalization of politics, Depersonalization of politics, European Council, European Council President, Council of the European Union, Council Presidency
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam
Změněno: 8. 9. 2022 21:51, Mgr. Lukáš Hamřík, Ph.D.
V originále
The Treaty of Lisbon brought about several institutional innovations that, at first sight, put greater emphasis on individual European Union (EU) politicians rather than EU institutions as such. Focusing on the Council of the European Union and the European Council, the question this study answers is whether politics at the two institutions’ institutional level has become more personalized. By employing the concept of the personalization of politics, and after conducting a quantitative and qualitative content analysis of the two institutions’ formal rules governing their internal functioning, this study concludes: (a) there has been institutional personalization of politics in both institutions, but (b) the collective actors and representatives of EU Member States are not really the losers in the personalizing process.
Anglicky
The Treaty of Lisbon brought about several institutional innovations that, at first sight, put greater emphasis on individual European Union (EU) politicians rather than EU institutions as such. Focusing on the Council of the European Union and the European Council, the question this study answers is whether politics at the two institutions’ institutional level has become more personalized. By employing the concept of the personalization of politics, and after conducting a quantitative and qualitative content analysis of the two institutions’ formal rules governing their internal functioning, this study concludes: (a) there has been institutional personalization of politics in both institutions, but (b) the collective actors and representatives of EU Member States are not really the losers in the personalizing process.