A multinational Delphi consensus to end the COVID-19 public
health threat

J 2022

A multinational Delphi consensus to end the COVID-19 public health threat

LAZARUS, Jeffrey V.; Diana ROMERO; Christopher J. KOPKA; Salim Abdool KARIM; Laith J. ABU-RADDAD et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

A multinational Delphi consensus to end the COVID-19 public health threat

Autoři

LAZARUS, Jeffrey V.; Diana ROMERO; Christopher J. KOPKA; Salim Abdool KARIM; Laith J. ABU-RADDAD; Gisele ALMEIDA; Ricardo BAPTISTA-LEITE; Joshua A. BAROCAS; Mauricio L. BARRETO; Yaneer BAR-YAM; Quique BASSAT; Carolina BATISTA; Morgan BAZILIAN; Shu-Ti CHIOU; del Rio CARLOS; Gregory J. DORE; George F. GAO; Lawrence O. GOSTIN; Margaret HELLARD; Jose L. JIMENEZ; Gagandeep KANG; Nancy LEE; Mojca MATICIC; Martin MCKEE; Sabin NSANZIMANA; Miquel OLIU-BARTON; Bary PRADELSKI; Oksana PYZIK; Kenneth RABIN; Sunil RAINA; Sabina Faiz RASHID; Magdalena RATHE; Rocio SAENZ; Sudhvir SINGH; Malene TROCK-HEMPLER; Sonia VILLAPOL; Peiling YAP; Agnes BINAGWAHO; Adeeba KAMARULZAMAN a Ayman EL-MOHANDES

Vydání

Nature, London, Nature Publishing Group, 2022, 0028-0836

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50600 5.6 Political science

Stát vydavatele

Německo

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 64.800

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Klíčová slova anglicky

COVID-19; government; public health; social policy

Štítky

riv_econ_ne

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 10. 10. 2025 14:27, Mgr. Alžběta Karolyiová

Anotace

V originále

Despite notable scientific and medical advances, broader political, socioeconomic and behavioural factors continue to undercut the response to the COVID-19 pandemic(1,2). Here we convened, as part of this Delphi study, a diverse, multidisciplinary panel of 386 academic, health, non-governmental organization, government and other experts in COVID-19 response from 112 countries and territories to recommend specific actions to end this persistent global threat to public health. The panel developed a set of 41 consensus statements and 57 recommendations to governments, health systems, industry and other key stakeholders across six domains: communication; health systems; vaccination; prevention; treatment and care; and inequities. In the wake of nearly three years of fragmented global and national responses, it is instructive to note that three of the highest-ranked recommendations call for the adoption of whole-of-society and whole-of-government approaches(1), while maintaining proven prevention measures using a vaccines-plus approach(2) that employs a range of public health and financial support measures to complement vaccination. Other recommendations with at least 99% combined agreement advise governments and other stakeholders to improve communication, rebuild public trust and engage communities(3) in the management of pandemic responses. The findings of the study, which have been further endorsed by 184 organizations globally, include points of unanimous agreement, as well as six recommendations with >5% disagreement, that provide health and social policy actions to address inadequacies in the pandemic response and help to bring this public health threat to an end.

Přiložené soubory

s41586-022-05398-2.pdf

Citovat

@article{2243433,
   author = {Lazarus, Jeffrey V. and Romero, Diana and Kopka, Christopher J. and Karim, Salim Abdool and AbuandRaddad, Laith J. and Almeida, Gisele and BaptistaandLeite, Ricardo and Barocas, Joshua A. and Barreto, Mauricio L. and BarandYam, Yaneer and Bassat, Quique and Batista, Carolina and Bazilian, Morgan and Chiou, ShuandTi and Carlos, del Rio and Dore, Gregory J. and Gao, George F. and Gostin, Lawrence O. and Hellard, Margaret and Jimenez, Jose L. and Kang, Gagandeep and Lee, Nancy and Maticic, Mojca and McKee, Martin and Nsanzimana, Sabin and OliuandBarton, Miquel and Pradelski, Bary and Pyzik, Oksana and Rabin, Kenneth and Raina, Sunil and Rashid, Sabina Faiz and Rathe, Magdalena and Saenz, Rocio and Singh, Sudhvir and TrockandHempler, Malene and Villapol, Sonia and Yap, Peiling and Binagwaho, Agnes and Kamarulzaman, Adeeba and ElandMohandes, Ayman},
   article_location = {London},
   article_number = {7935},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05398-2},
   keywords = {COVID-19; government; public health; social policy},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0028-0836},
   journal = {Nature},
   title = {A multinational Delphi consensus to end the COVID-19 public health threat},
   url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05398-2},
   volume = {611},
   year = {2022}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 2243433
AU  - Lazarus, Jeffrey V. - Romero, Diana - Kopka, Christopher J. - Karim, Salim Abdool - Abu-Raddad, Laith J. - Almeida, Gisele - Baptista-Leite, Ricardo - Barocas, Joshua A. - Barreto, Mauricio L. - Bar-Yam, Yaneer - Bassat, Quique - Batista, Carolina - Bazilian, Morgan - Chiou, Shu-Ti - Carlos, del Rio - Dore, Gregory J. - Gao, George F. - Gostin, Lawrence O. - Hellard, Margaret - Jimenez, Jose L. - Kang, Gagandeep - Lee, Nancy - Maticic, Mojca - McKee, Martin - Nsanzimana, Sabin - Oliu-Barton, Miquel - Pradelski, Bary - Pyzik, Oksana - Rabin, Kenneth - Raina, Sunil - Rashid, Sabina Faiz - Rathe, Magdalena - Saenz, Rocio - Singh, Sudhvir - Trock-Hempler, Malene - Villapol, Sonia - Yap, Peiling - Binagwaho, Agnes - Kamarulzaman, Adeeba - El-Mohandes, Ayman
PY  - 2022
TI  - A multinational Delphi consensus to end the COVID-19 public health threat
JF  - Nature
VL  - 611
IS  - 7935
SP  - 332-354
EP  - 332-354
PB  - Nature Publishing Group
SN  - 00280836
KW  - COVID-19
KW  - government
KW  - public health
KW  - social policy
UR  - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05398-2
N2  - Despite notable scientific and medical advances, broader political, socioeconomic and behavioural factors continue to undercut the response to the COVID-19 pandemic(1,2). Here we convened, as part of this Delphi study, a diverse, multidisciplinary panel of 386 academic, health, non-governmental organization, government and other experts in COVID-19 response from 112 countries and territories to recommend specific actions to end this persistent global threat to public health. The panel developed a set of 41 consensus statements and 57 recommendations to governments, health systems, industry and other key stakeholders across six domains: communication; health systems; vaccination; prevention; treatment and care; and inequities. In the wake of nearly three years of fragmented global and national responses, it is instructive to note that three of the highest-ranked recommendations call for the adoption of whole-of-society and whole-of-government approaches(1), while maintaining proven prevention measures using a vaccines-plus approach(2) that employs a range of public health and financial support measures to complement vaccination. Other recommendations with at least 99% combined agreement advise governments and other stakeholders to improve communication, rebuild public trust and engage communities(3) in the management of pandemic responses. The findings of the study, which have been further endorsed by 184 organizations globally, include points of unanimous agreement, as well as six recommendations with >5% disagreement, that provide health and social policy actions to address inadequacies in the pandemic response and help to bring this public health threat to an end.
ER  -

Přehled o publikaci