2022
House mouse subspecies do differ in their social structure
MIKULA, Ondřej; Miloš MACHOLÁN; Ľudovít ĎUREJE; Zuzana HIADLOVSKÁ; Kristina DANISZOVÁ et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
House mouse subspecies do differ in their social structure
Autoři
MIKULA, Ondřej; Miloš MACHOLÁN; Ľudovít ĎUREJE; Zuzana HIADLOVSKÁ; Kristina DANISZOVÁ; Kateřina JANOTOVÁ a Barbora VOŠLAJEROVÁ BÍMOVÁ
Vydání
ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, WILEY, 2022, 2045-7758
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
10511 Environmental sciences
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 2.600
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14310/22:00128178
Organizační jednotka
Přírodovědecká fakulta
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
demes; M. m. domesticus; modularity; Mus musculus musculus; radio-frequency identification; social networks
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 8. 2. 2023 08:29, Mgr. Marie Novosadová Šípková, DiS.
Anotace
V originále
It is widely acknowledged that population structure can have a substantial impact on evolutionary trajectories. In social animals, this structure is strongly influenced by relationships among the population members, so studies of differences in social structure between diverging populations or nascent species are of prime interest. Ideal models for such a study are two house mouse subspecies, Mus musculus musculus and M. m. domesticus, meeting in Europe along a secondary contact zone. Though the latter subspecies has usually been supposed to form tighter and more isolated social units than the former, the evidence is still inconclusive. Here, we carried out a series of radiofrequency identification experiments in semi-natural enclosures to gather large longitudinal data sets on individual mouse movements. The data were summarized in the form of uni- and multi-layer social networks. Within them, we could delimit and describe the social units (“modules”). While the number of estimated units was similar in both subspecies, domesticus revealed a more “modular” structure. This subspecies also showed more intramodular social interactions, higher spatial module separation, higher intramodular persistence of parent–offspring contacts, and lower multiple paternity, suggesting more effective control of dominant males over reproduction. We also demonstrate that long-lasting modules can be identified with basic reproductive units or demes. We thus provide the first robust evidence that the two subspecies differ in their social structure and dynamics of the structure formation.
Návaznosti
| LM2018140, projekt VaV |
|