FEARON, William F, Frederik M ZIMMERMANN, De Bruyne BERNARD, Zsolt PIROTH, M. VAN STRATEN ALBERT H, Laszlo SZEKELY, Giedrius DAVIDAVICIUS, Gintaras KALINAUSKAS, Samer MANSOUR, Rajesh KHARBANDA, Nikolaos OSTLUND-PAPADOGEORGOS, Adel AMINIAN, Keith G OLDROYD, Nawwar AL-ATTAR, Nikola JAGIC, Jan-Henk E DAMBRINK, Petr KALA, Oskar ANGERAS, Philip MACCARTHY, Olaf WENDLER, Filip CASSELMAN, Nils WITT, Kreton MAVROMATIS, Steven E S MINER, Jaydeep SARMA, Thomas ENGSTROM, Evald H CHRISTIANSEN, Pim A L TONINO, Michael J REARDON, Di LU, Victoria Y DING, Yuhei KOBAYASHI, Mark A HLATKY, Kenneth W MAHAFFEY, Manisha DESAI, Y Joseph WOO, Alan C YEUNG a Nico H J PIJLS. Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI as Compared with Coronary Bypass Surgery. New England Journal of Medicine. Waltham: Massachussetts Medical Society, 2022, roč. 386, č. 2, s. 128-137. ISSN 0028-4793. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2112299.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI as Compared with Coronary Bypass Surgery
Autoři FEARON, William F (garant), Frederik M ZIMMERMANN, De Bruyne BERNARD, Zsolt PIROTH, M. VAN STRATEN ALBERT H, Laszlo SZEKELY, Giedrius DAVIDAVICIUS, Gintaras KALINAUSKAS, Samer MANSOUR, Rajesh KHARBANDA, Nikolaos OSTLUND-PAPADOGEORGOS, Adel AMINIAN, Keith G OLDROYD, Nawwar AL-ATTAR, Nikola JAGIC, Jan-Henk E DAMBRINK, Petr KALA (203 Česká republika, domácí), Oskar ANGERAS, Philip MACCARTHY, Olaf WENDLER, Filip CASSELMAN, Nils WITT, Kreton MAVROMATIS, Steven E S MINER, Jaydeep SARMA, Thomas ENGSTROM, Evald H CHRISTIANSEN, Pim A L TONINO, Michael J REARDON, Di LU, Victoria Y DING, Yuhei KOBAYASHI, Mark A HLATKY, Kenneth W MAHAFFEY, Manisha DESAI, Y Joseph WOO, Alan C YEUNG a Nico H J PIJLS.
Vydání New England Journal of Medicine, Waltham, Massachussetts Medical Society, 2022, 0028-4793.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor 30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Stát vydavatele Spojené státy
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
WWW URL
Impakt faktor Impact factor: 158.500
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14110/22:00128484
Organizační jednotka Lékařská fakulta
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2112299
UT WoS 000714422300001
Klíčová slova anglicky Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI; Coronary Bypass Surgery
Štítky 14110211, rivok
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil Změnila: Mgr. Tereza Miškechová, učo 341652. Změněno: 1. 2. 2023 13:48.
Anotace
BACKGROUND Patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease have been found to have better outcomes with coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) than with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but studies in which PCI is guided by measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) have been lacking. METHODS In this multicenter, international, noninferiority trial, patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to undergo CABG or FFR-guided PCI with current-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents. The primary end point was the occurrence within 1 year of a major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular event, defined as death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization. Noninferiority of FFR-guided PCI to CABG was prespecified as an upper boundary of less than 1.65 for the 95% confidence interval of the hazard ratio. Secondary end points included a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke; safety was also assessed. RESULTS A total of 1500 patients underwent randomization at 48 centers. Patients assigned to undergo PCI received a mean (+/- SD) of 3.7 +/- 1.9 stents, and those assigned to undergo CABG received 3.4 +/- 1.0 distal anastomoses. The 1-year incidence of the composite primary end point was 10.6% among patients randomly assigned to undergo FFR-guided PCI and 6.9% among those assigned to undergo CABG (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 2.2), findings that were not consistent with noninferiority of FFR-guided PCI (P = 0.35 for noninferiority). The incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke was 7.3% in the FFR-guided PCI group and 5.2% in the CABG group (hazard ratio, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.9 to 2.1). The incidences of major bleeding, arrhythmia, and acute kidney injury were higher in the CABG group than in the FFR-guided PCI group. CONCLUSIONS In patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease, FFR-guided PCI was not found to be noninferior to CABG with respect to the incidence of a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization at 1 year.
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 21. 5. 2024 02:58