Intergenerational transmission of generativity and stagnation within families in a society after a macrosocial change : A two-generation study

MILLOVÁ, Katarína; Tatiana MALATINCOVÁ a Marek BLATNÝ. Intergenerational transmission of generativity and stagnation within families in a society after a macrosocial change : A two-generation study. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY. SPRINGER, 2023, roč. 42, č. 4, s. 3061-3075. ISSN 1046-1310. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01688-6.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Intergenerational transmission of generativity and stagnation within families in a society after a macrosocial change : A two-generation study

Autoři

MILLOVÁ, Katarína; Tatiana MALATINCOVÁ ORCID a Marek BLATNÝ

Vydání

CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, SPRINGER, 2023, 1046-1310

---

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50101 Psychology

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Webová stránka výsledku u vydavatele s odkazem na plný text

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 2.500

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14210/23:00130554

Organizační jednotka

Filozofická fakulta

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01688-6

UT WoS

000634640700001

EID Scopus

2-s2.0-85103413099

Klíčová slova česky

generativita; stagnace; rodina; makrosociální změna; vzdělání; osobnostní rysy

Klíčová slova anglicky

Generativity; Stagnation; Family; Macrosocial change; Education; Personality traits

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

---

Anotace

V originále

Intergenerational transmission of generativity is a process through which one generation passes elements of its generative potential, such as values and patterns of behavior, on to another. So far, most research on intergenerational transmission of generativity came from relatively stable societies, where the transmission process might be facilitated by the fact that adjacent generations face relatively similar socioeconomic challenges and can therefore make use of similar solutions. In contrast, our study focused on the relationships between parental and offspring characteristics in the context of a society that had undergone a major macro-social change in the past few decades, involving the downfall of the communist regime and subsequent transformation of major political, cultural, and social structures and norms. Apart from examining whether relationships between parental and offspring generative concern and action would show patterns similar to those observed in previous studies, we looked at intergenerational similarities in stagnation, which was recently redefined as a construct partly separable from generativity (Van Hiel et al. Journal of Personality, 74(2), 543–574, 2006). One hundred and twenty-three predominantly female university students and their parents completed measures of generative concern, generative action, stagnation, and Big Five personality traits. Multiple-group path analysis revealed that the structure of the relationships between generativity, stagnation and personality traits did not differ significantly between the groups of parents and offspring. Further analyses showed that parental generative concern was not related to offspring generative concern, but maternal generative action was significantly related to offspring generative action, and maternal stagnation was significantly related to offspring stagnation. The parental level of education was unrelated to offspring generativity or stagnation. These results indicate a certain degree of intergenerational continuity of generativity and stagnation, especially their behavioral components, even though the two generations in our study were raised in different socio-cultural contexts.