2023
From Minimalism to the Substantive Core and Back: The Slovak Constitutional Court and (the Lack of) Constitutional Identity
ŠIPULOVÁ, Katarína a Max STEUERZákladní údaje
Originální název
From Minimalism to the Substantive Core and Back: The Slovak Constitutional Court and (the Lack of) Constitutional Identity
Autoři
ŠIPULOVÁ, Katarína ORCID a Max STEUER
Vydání
1st. Neuveden, The Jurisprudence of Particularism National Identity Claims in Central Europe, od s. 81-104, 24 s. Bloomsbury Open Access, Hart Publishing 2023, 2023
Nakladatel
Hart Publishing
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize
Obor
50501 Law
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání
tištěná verze "print"
Odkazy
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14220/23:00130672
Organizační jednotka
Právnická fakulta
ISBN
978-1-5099-6012-5
Klíčová slova anglicky
constitutional identity; particularism; constitutional courts; Slovak Constitutional Court
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 9. 2. 2024 09:25, Mgr. Petra Georgala
Anotace
V originále
The chapter on the SCC hence demonstrates that constitutional courts may develop their reading of constitutional identity in a reactive way. The lack of textual hooks in the text of the Slovak Constitution, combined with experience of political unrest, tradition of judicial minimalism, and dominance of separation of powers disputes in the SCC’s case law, eventually led the court to ground its approach to constitutional identity in the substantive core doctrine. This doctrine represents a reading of constitutional identity which aims at integrating democracy, human rights and the rule of law. We argue that locking in the principle of judicial independence became important both for the SCC’s self-preservation and for its understanding of the threats to the Slovak judiciary in general. Therefore, the government’s attempt to interfere in judicial independence via the security screening of judges spurred the court to quash several provisions of the constitutional act. However, in doing so the SCC also created a space for a pushback from the populist government, which demanded more accountability for the ‘non-democratic’ judiciary by curtailing the court’s formal powers in an accelerated procedure. This is important for the broader literature examining legislative reactions to judicialisation of politics.