J 2023

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Therapy of Cardiogenic Shock: Results of the ECMO-CS Randomized Clinical Trial

OSTADAL, Petr; Richard ROKYTA; Jiri KARASEK; Andreas KRUGER; Dagmar VONDRAKOVA et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Therapy of Cardiogenic Shock: Results of the ECMO-CS Randomized Clinical Trial

Autoři

OSTADAL, Petr; Richard ROKYTA; Jiri KARASEK; Andreas KRUGER; Dagmar VONDRAKOVA; Marek JANOTKA; Jan NAAR; Jana SMALCOVA; Marketa HUBATOVA; Milan HROMADKA; Stefan VOLOVAR; Miroslava SEYFRYDOVA; Jiří JARKOVSKÝ ORCID; Michal SVOBODA; Ales LINHART a Jan BELOHLAVEK

Vydání

Circulation, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams Wilkins, 2023, 0009-7322

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 35.600

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/23:00131021

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

EID Scopus

Klíčová slova anglicky

clinical trial; shock; cardiogenic; therapy

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 21. 6. 2023 08:55, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

Background: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly being used for circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock, although the evidence supporting its use in this context remains insufficient. The ECMO-CS trial (Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Therapy of Cardiogenic Shock) aimed to compare immediate implementation of VA-ECMO versus an initially conservative therapy (allowing downstream use of VA-ECMO) in patients with rapidly deteriorating or severe cardiogenic shock.Methods: This multicenter, randomized, investigator-initiated, academic clinical trial included patients with either rapidly deteriorating or severe cardiogenic shock. Patients were randomly assigned to immediate VA-ECMO or no immediate VA-ECMO. Other diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were performed as per current standards of care. In the early conservative group, VA-ECMO could be used downstream in case of worsening hemodynamic status. The primary end point was the composite of death from any cause, resuscitated circulatory arrest, and implementation of another mechanical circulatory support device at 30 days.Results: A total of 122 patients were randomized; after excluding 5 patients because of the absence of informed consent, 117 subjects were included in the analysis, of whom 58 were randomized to immediate VA-ECMO and 59 to no immediate VA-ECMO. The composite primary end point occurred in 37 (63.8%) and 42 (71.2%) patients in the immediate VA-ECMO and the no early VA-ECMO groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.46-1.12]; P=0.21). VA-ECMO was used in 23 (39%) of no early VA-ECMO patients. The 30-day incidence of resuscitated cardiac arrest (10.3.% versus 13.6%; risk difference, -3.2 [95% CI, -15.0 to 8.5]), all-cause mortality (50.0% versus 47.5%; risk difference, 2.5 [95% CI, -15.6 to 20.7]), serious adverse events (60.3% versus 61.0%; risk difference, -0.7 [95% CI, -18.4 to 17.0]), sepsis, pneumonia, stroke, leg ischemia, and bleeding was not statistically different between the immediate VA-ECMO and the no immediate VA-ECMO groups.Conclusions: Immediate implementation of VA-ECMO in patients with rapidly deteriorating or severe cardiogenic shock did not improve clinical outcomes compared with an early conservative strategy that permitted downstream use of VA-ECMO in case of worsening hemodynamic status.Registration:URL: ; Unique identifier: NCT02301819.