2023
The Relative Age Effect at Different Age Periods in Soccer: A Meta-Analysis
BOZDĚCH, Michal; Adrián AGRICOLA a Jiří ZHÁNĚLZákladní údaje
Originální název
The Relative Age Effect at Different Age Periods in Soccer: A Meta-Analysis
Autoři
Vydání
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, UNITED STATES, SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC, 2023, 0031-5125
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30306 Sport and fitness sciences
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 1.400
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14510/23:00132076
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta sportovních studií
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
annual grouping; football; adolescence; youth development in sport; age disparity impact; performance-driven athlete selection
Štítky
Změněno: 4. 4. 2024 16:11, Mgr. Pavlína Roučová, DiS.
Anotace
V originále
In the selection of young athletes, earlier-born adolescents often leverage their temporary biological advantage over their later-born peers from the same cohort, giving rise to the phenomenon known as the Relative Age Effect (RAE). In this study, we delved into the complexities of the RAE in soccer by reviewing 563 independent research samples across 90 articles. Our analysis showed that age period and performance level are pivotal factors influencing the magnitude of the RAE. The adolescent age period emerged as a significant RAE determinant, showcasing the highest effect size magnitudes in our findings. Among athletes of different performance levels, adult European soccer players have been extensively studied, and they have exhibited the most pronounced RAE magnitudes. Intriguingly, our findings reveal another compelling trend: the frequency of players born early versus late in the eligible birth year escalated as player performance levels increased, particularly during adolescence. Coaches and players appear to capitalize unconsciously on this maturational advantage, though this strategy wanes post-adolescence. While there are currently no penalties for this team selection practice, our findings stress the need for coaches to comprehend the ramifications of selecting athletes with an age bias We offer insights into RAE complexities, highlight the synergy of age and performance in these transitory advantages, and advance arguments for more fairly selecting and developing youth athletes.