J 2023

The Difference in the Creativity of People Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing and Those with Typical Hearing: A Scoping Review

POTMESILOVA, Petra, Milon POTMESIL a Miloslav KLUGAR

Základní údaje

Originální název

The Difference in the Creativity of People Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing and Those with Typical Hearing: A Scoping Review

Autoři

POTMESILOVA, Petra (203 Česká republika), Milon POTMESIL (203 Česká republika) a Miloslav KLUGAR (203 Česká republika, domácí)

Vydání

Children-Basel, BASEL, SWITZERLAND, MDPI AG, 2023, 2227-9067

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30230 Other clinical medicine subjects

Stát vydavatele

Švýcarsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 2.400 v roce 2022

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/23:00133388

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

UT WoS

001057378900001

Klíčová slova anglicky

hard of hearing persons; person; deaf; creativeness; review; academic; thinking

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 1. 2. 2024 14:47, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

The scoping review aimed to describe differences in creativity between deaf and hard of hearing and typically hearing people. The research question for the review was: what are the differences in the creativity of deaf and hard-of-hearing people in comparison with people with typical hearing? A total of eleven databases were used for the search, as well as sources of the unpublished studies/gray literature. The scoping review was prepared following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA frame as a basis for reporting scoping reviews. A total of 30 studies were analyzed concerning the selected research areas. Intrinsic creativity was the first area identified. Specific activities for the development of creativity formed the second area for analysis. The third area focused on differences in creativity between deaf and hard of hearing and typically hearing. The fourth area includes studies that call for an equitable research environment.