2023
Validation of calculational determination of 18O(p,n) secondary neutron field
ZMEŠKAL, Marek; Michal KOŠŤÁL; Tomáš CZAKOJ; Jan ŠIMON; Václav ZACH et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Validation of calculational determination of 18O(p,n) secondary neutron field
Autoři
ZMEŠKAL, Marek; Michal KOŠŤÁL; Tomáš CZAKOJ; Jan ŠIMON; Václav ZACH; Ondřej LEBEDA a Zdeněk MATĚJ ORCID
Vydání
Sacramento, 15th International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology (ND2022), od s. 1-3, 3 s. 2023
Nakladatel
15th International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology (ND2022)
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Stať ve sborníku
Obor
20201 Electrical and electronic engineering
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání
elektronická verze "online"
Odkazy
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14330/23:00133902
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta informatiky
ISSN
UT WoS
Klíčová slova anglicky
18O; secondary neutron
Změněno: 12. 11. 2024 09:48, doc. RNDr. Zdeněk Matěj, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
Cyclotrons used to produce medical isotopes are relatively widespread. Nowadays, it is popular to place small and compact accelerators directly in hospitals. This approach simplifies handling of the produced radiopharmaceuticals, but it imposes strict radiation safety measures during production. For optimal utilization of isotope production cyclotrons, the exact knowledge of leakage neutron field is essential due to the deep penetration ability of the high energy neutrons and the accompanied secondary radiation production. Our paper presents measurement of the neutron leakage spectra for various angles from an open target assembly at the cyclotron U-120M at NPI of CAS. These spectra are compared with data obtained from a compact medical cyclotron IBA Cyclone 18/9 in UJV Rez and also with activation measurements of reactions with different threshold energies. All data were also compared with calculations made with different Monte Carlo codes using both models and data libraries. The preliminary results show significant disagreement between experiments and theoretical predictions. These findings could have implications not only to the nuclear data community but also to the production accelerators operators at the licensing stage.