2024
Coping with the Murder: The Impact of Ján Kuciak’s Assassination on Slovak Investigative Journalists
URBÁNIKOVÁ, Marína a Lenka HANIKOVÁZákladní údaje
Originální název
Coping with the Murder: The Impact of Ján Kuciak’s Assassination on Slovak Investigative Journalists
Autoři
URBÁNIKOVÁ, Marína a Lenka HANIKOVÁ
Vydání
Abingdon, New York, Journalism and Safety: An Introduction to the Field, 1, 2024
Nakladatel
Routledge
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize
Obor
50800 5.8 Media and communications
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání
tištěná verze "print"
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta sociálních studií
ISBN
978-1-032-70294-0
Klíčová slova anglicky
Coping mechanisms; safety and security practices; stress; trauma; violence against journalists; Ján Kuciak; Martina Kušnírová; murder; Slovakia
Změněno: 1. 4. 2024 12:56, Mgr. et Mgr. Marína Urbániková, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
In this contribution, using a case-study approach, we focus on the assassination of Ján Kuciak and his fiancée and explore the impact and consequences that it had on the community of investigative journalists in Slovakia. By conducting a series of semi-structured interviews with top investigative journalists (N = 12), we seek to answer two questions: How have they coped with the murder of their colleague? And, how has this incident changed their everyday journalistic practices and routines when it comes to achieving and maintaining safety? We identified 12 coping actions which, based on their function, were organised into five higher order families of coping: emotional purging; sharing and support seeking; avoidance and displacement; defiance and defence; and spreading the legacy and giving meaning to the tragedy. Regarding safety and security practices, the journalists claim that their approach has fundamentally changed. A variety of measures to stay safe, both online and offline, were adopted both on the organisational and on the individual level. However, many of these measures are not used consistently, mostly because they are not deemed necessary when covering non-sensitive topics, but also because of their impracticality in everyday journalistic work, and sceptical and fatalistic approach of the journalists to safety.