2024
Direct mailing of HPV self-sampling kits to women aged 50-65 non-participating in cervical screening in the Czech Republic
NGO, Ondřej; Renata CHLOUPKOVÁ; David CIBULA; Jiri SLAMA; Lucie MANDELOVA et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Direct mailing of HPV self-sampling kits to women aged 50-65 non-participating in cervical screening in the Czech Republic
Autoři
NGO, Ondřej; Renata CHLOUPKOVÁ; David CIBULA; Jiri SLAMA; Lucie MANDELOVA; Karel HEJDUK; Marian HAJDUCH; Petr MINKA; Vladimira KOUDELAKOVA; Hana JAWOREK; Marketa TRNKOVA; Peter VANEK; Vladimir DVORAK; Ladislav DUŠEK a Ondřej MÁJEK ORCID
Vydání
European journal of public health, OXFORD, OXFORD UNIV PRESS, 2024, 1101-1262
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30214 Obstetrics and gynaecology
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 3.900
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/24:00135936
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
001147898300001
EID Scopus
2-s2.0-85189660731
Klíčová slova anglicky
cervical screening; HPV self-sampling kits; Czech Republic
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 12. 7. 2024 12:58, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Background: A population-based cervical cancer screening programme is implemented in the Czech Republic. However, participation is insufficient among women over 50 years. This study aimed to estimate the potential improvement in participation through directly mailed HPV self-sampling kits (HPVssk) compared with standard invitation letters in women aged 50-65 non-participating in screening.Methods: The study recruited 1564 eligible women (no cervical cancer screening in the last 3 years or more, no previous treatment associated with cervical lesions or cervical cancer). Eight hundred women were mailed with an HPVssk (HPVssk group), and 764 women were sent a standard invitation letter (control group) inviting them to a routine screening (Pap test). The primary outcome was a comparison of the overall participation rate between study groups using a binominal regression model.Results: The participation rate in the HPVssk group was 13.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.2-15.9%; 7.4% of women returned the HPVssk and 6.0% attended gynaecological examination] and 5.0% (95% CI 3.6-6.8%) in the control group. Using the binominal regression model, the difference between the groups was estimated as 7.6% (95% CI 5.0-10.2%; P < 0.001). In the HPVssk group, 22% of women who returned HPVssk had a positive result and 70% of them underwent a follow-up examination.Conclusions: Compared with traditional invitation letters, the direct mailing of the HPVssk achieved a significantly higher participation rate, along with a notable HPV positivity rate among HPVssk responders. This approach offers a potentially viable method for engaging women who have not yet attended a cervical screening programme.
Návaznosti
| EF16_013/0001818, projekt VaV |
|