2024
Evaluating Algorithmic Bias in Models for Predicting Academic Performance of Filipino Students
ŠVÁBENSKÝ, Valdemar; Mélina VERGER; Maria Mercedes T. RODRIGO; Clarence James G. MONTEROZO; Ryan S. BAKER et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Evaluating Algorithmic Bias in Models for Predicting Academic Performance of Filipino Students
Autoři
ŠVÁBENSKÝ, Valdemar ORCID; Mélina VERGER; Maria Mercedes T. RODRIGO; Clarence James G. MONTEROZO; Ryan S. BAKER; Miguel Zenon Nicanor L. SAAVEDRA; Sébastien LALLÉ a Atsushi SHIMADA
Vydání
17th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM 2024), 2024
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Konferenční abstrakt
Obor
10201 Computer sciences, information science, bioinformatics
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ne
Klíčová slova anglicky
fairness; online learning; distance education; performance prediction; educational data mining; learning analytics
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 15. 7. 2024 06:36, RNDr. Valdemar Švábenský, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
Algorithmic bias is a major issue in machine learning models in educational contexts. However, it has not yet been studied thoroughly in Asian learning contexts, and only limited work has considered algorithmic bias based on regional (sub-national) background. As a step towards addressing this gap, this paper examines the population of 5,986 students at a large university in the Philippines, investigating algorithmic bias based on students' regional background. The university used the Canvas learning management system (LMS) in its online courses across a broad range of domains. Over the period of three semesters, we collected 48.7 million log records of the students' activity in Canvas. We used these logs to train binary classification models that predict student grades from the LMS activity. The best-performing model reached AUC of 0.75 and weighted F1-score of 0.79. Subsequently, we examined the data for bias based on students' region. Evaluation using three metrics: AUC, weighted F1-score, and MADD showed consistent results across all demographic groups. Thus, no unfairness was observed against a particular student group in the grade predictions.