Adaptation, Experimentation or Conservation? The Uses of
Differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency
Directive

J 2024

Adaptation, Experimentation or Conservation? The Uses of Differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive

HOPPE, Alexander, Michael HÜBNER, Sebastiaan PRINCEN a Martin ŠVEC

Základní údaje

Originální název

Adaptation, Experimentation or Conservation? The Uses of Differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive

Autoři

HOPPE, Alexander, Michael HÜBNER, Sebastiaan PRINCEN a Martin ŠVEC (203 Česká republika, domácí)

Vydání

JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies, Hoboken, Wiley, 2024, 0021-9886

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50501 Law

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Open access článku

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 2.200 v roce 2022

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13647

UT WoS

001274742100001

Klíčová slova česky

Energetika; Energetická účinnost; právo EU

Klíčová slova anglicky

Energy Law; Energy Efficiency; EU Law

Štítky

energetické právo, energetický trh, právo EU, rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 23. 8. 2024 13:31, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Anotace

V originále

In this article, we introduce an innovative theoretical framework to analyse the use of differentiated implementation in the implementation process of European Union (EU) Directives. We identify rationales for offering flexibility in EU Directives as well as motives for policy-makers to make use of the discretion. We analyse patterns and drivers of differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive (EED) in four member states in order to assess whether practices of differentiated implementation conform to the rationales for offering flexibility. We show that member states mainly use the flexibility offered to retain existing policies. In addition, the EED led to some mutual learning based on experimentation, although this effect is limited. Whilst the EED offered a high potential for mutual learning, the member states did not use this opportunity. Overall, the implementation of the EED offers mixed evidence for the use of differentiated implementation to support differentiation.

Citovat

HOPPE, Alexander, Michael HÜBNER, Sebastiaan PRINCEN a Martin ŠVEC. Adaptation, Experimentation or Conservation? The Uses of Differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive. JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies. Hoboken: Wiley, 2024, roč. 2024, 24 July 2024, s. 1-20. ISSN 0021-9886. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13647.

@article{2419859,
   author = {Hoppe, Alexander and Hübner, Michael and Princen, Sebastiaan and Švec, Martin},
   article_location = {Hoboken},
   article_number = {24 July 2024},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13647},
   keywords = {Energy Law; Energy Efficiency; EU Law},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0021-9886},
   journal = {JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies},
   title = {Adaptation, Experimentation or Conservation? The Uses of Differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive},
   url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcms.13647},
   volume = {2024},
   year = {2024}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 2419859
AU  - Hoppe, Alexander - Hübner, Michael - Princen, Sebastiaan - Švec, Martin
PY  - 2024
TI  - Adaptation, Experimentation or Conservation? The Uses of Differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive
JF  - JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies
VL  - 2024
IS  - 24 July 2024
SP  - 1-20
EP  - 1-20
PB  - Wiley
SN  - 00219886
KW  - Energy Law
KW  - Energy Efficiency
KW  - EU Law
UR  - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcms.13647
N2  - In this article, we introduce an innovative theoretical framework to analyse the use of differentiated implementation in the implementation process of European Union (EU) Directives. We identify rationales for offering flexibility in EU Directives as well as motives for policy-makers to make use of the discretion. We analyse patterns and drivers of differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive (EED) in four member states in order to assess whether practices of differentiated implementation conform to the rationales for offering flexibility. We show that member states mainly use the flexibility offered to retain existing policies. In addition, the EED led to some mutual learning based on experimentation, although this effect is limited. Whilst the EED offered a high potential for mutual learning, the member states did not use this opportunity. Overall, the implementation of the EED offers mixed evidence for the use of differentiated implementation to support differentiation.
ER  -

HOPPE, Alexander, Michael HÜBNER, Sebastiaan PRINCEN a Martin ŠVEC. Adaptation, Experimentation or Conservation? The Uses of Differentiated implementation under the Energy Efficiency Directive. \textit{JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies}. Hoboken: Wiley, 2024, roč.~2024, 24 July 2024, s.~1-20. ISSN~0021-9886. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13647.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci