J 2024

Oral decitabine/cedazuridine versus intravenous decitabine for acute myeloid leukaemia: A randomised, crossover, registration, pharmacokinetics study

GEISSLER, Klaus, Zdenek KORISTEK, del Castillo Teresa BERNAL, Jan NOVAK, Gabriela RODRIGUEZ-MACIAS et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Oral decitabine/cedazuridine versus intravenous decitabine for acute myeloid leukaemia: A randomised, crossover, registration, pharmacokinetics study

Autoři

GEISSLER, Klaus, Zdenek KORISTEK, del Castillo Teresa BERNAL, Jan NOVAK, Gabriela RODRIGUEZ-MACIAS, Stephan K METZELDER, Arpad ILLES, Jiří MAYER, Montserrat ARNAN, Mary-Margaret KEATING, Juergen KRAUTER, Monia LUNGHI, Nicola Stefano FRACCHIOLLA, Uwe PLATZBECKER, Valeria SANTINI, Yuri SANO, Aram OGANESIAN, Harold KEER a Michael LUEBBERT

Vydání

British journal of haematology, Hoboken, Wiley-Blackwell, 2024, 0007-1048

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30205 Hematology

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 6.500 v roce 2022

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

UT WoS

001318836700001

Klíčová slova anglicky

acute myeloid leukaemia; decitabine/cedazuridine; DNA methyltransferase inhibitors; hypomethylating agents; somatic mutations

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 1. 10. 2024 10:42, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

This study compared decitabine exposure when administered IV (DEC-IV) at a dose of 20 mg/m(2) for 5-days with orally administered decitabine with cedazuridine (DEC-C), as well as the clinical efficacy and safety of DEC-C in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) who were ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy. In all, 89 patients were randomised 1:1 to DEC-IV or oral DEC-C (days 1-5 in a 28-day treatment cycle), followed by 5 days of the other formulation in the next treatment cycle. All patients received oral DEC-C for subsequent treatment cycles until treatment discontinuation. Equivalent systemic decitabine exposures were demonstrated (5-day area under the curve ratio between the two decitabine formulations of 99.64 [90% confidence interval 91.23%, 108.80%]). Demethylation rates also were similar (<= 1.1% difference). Median overall survival (OS), clinical response and safety profile with oral DEC-C were consistent with those previously observed with DEC-IV. Next-generation sequencing was performed to identify molecular abnormalities that impact OS and TP53 mutations were associated with a poor outcome. These findings support the use of oral DEC-C in patients with AML.