2024
New models for prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in lung resection candidates
SVOBODA, Michal, Ivan ČUNDRLE, Marek PLUTINSKÝ, Pavel HOMOLKA, Ladislav MITÁŠ et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
New models for prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in lung resection candidates
Autoři
SVOBODA, Michal (203 Česká republika, domácí), Ivan ČUNDRLE (203 Česká republika, domácí), Marek PLUTINSKÝ (703 Slovensko, domácí), Pavel HOMOLKA (203 Česká republika), Ladislav MITÁŠ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Zdeněk CHOVANEC (203 Česká republika, domácí), Lyle J OLSON a Kristián BRAT (703 Slovensko, domácí)
Vydání
ERJ open research, SHEFFIELD, EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD, 2024, 2312-0541
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30203 Respiratory systems
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 4.300 v roce 2023
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/24:00137805
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
001340127300002
Klíčová slova anglicky
postoperative pulmonary complications; lung resection
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 28. 11. 2024 10:19, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Introduction: In recent years, ventilatory efficiency (minute ventilation (V'(E))/carbon dioxide production (V'(CO2) ) slope) and partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (P (ETCO2) ) have emerged as independent predictors of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). Single parameters may give only partial information regarding periprocedural hazards. Accordingly, our aim was to create prediction models with improved ability to stratify PPC risk in patients scheduled for elective lung resection surgery. Methods: This post hoc analysis was comprised of consecutive lung resection candidates from two prior prospective trials. All individuals completed pulmonary function tests and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Logistic regression analyses were used for identification of risk factors for PPC that were entered into the final risk prediction models. Two risk models were developed; the first used rest P (ETCO2) (for patients with no available CPET data), the second used V'(E)/ V'(CO2) slope (for patients with available CPET data). Receiver operating characteristic analysis with the De-Long test and area under the curve (AUC) were used for comparison of models. Results: The dataset from 423 patients was randomly split into the derivation (n=310) and validation (n=113) cohorts. Two final models were developed, both including sex, thoracotomy, "atypical" resection and forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity ratio as risk factors. In addition, the first model also included rest P (ETCO2) , while the second model used V'(E)/V'(CO2) slope from CPET. AUCs of risk scores were 0.795 (95% CI: 0.739-0.851) and 0.793 (95% CI: 0.737-0.849); both p<0.001. No differences in AUCs were found between the derivation and validation cohorts. Conclusions: We created two multicomponental models for PPC risk prediction, both having excellent predictive properties.