Constitutional Conventions in Central Europe: When Two Are
Doing the Same It Is Not Always the Same

C 2025

Constitutional Conventions in Central Europe: When Two Are Doing the Same It Is Not Always the Same

KOSAŘ, David a Attila VINCZE

Základní údaje

Originální název

Constitutional Conventions in Central Europe: When Two Are Doing the Same It Is Not Always the Same

Autoři

KOSAŘ, David a Attila VINCZE

Vydání

1. vyd. London - New York, Constitutional Conventions Theories, Practices and Dynamics, od s. 177-196, 20 s. 2025

Nakladatel

Routledge

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize

Obor

50501 Law

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Forma vydání

tištěná verze "print"

Odkazy

Web nakladatele

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

ISBN

978-1-032-82833-6

DOI

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003506577-10

EID Scopus

2-s2.0-85215251665

Klíčová slova anglicky

Constitutional conventions; unwritten law; informal institutions; settled practice; constitutional reason; civil law systems

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 12. 3. 2026 11:21, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Anotace

V originále

The aim of this chapter is thus to explore whether there are any differences between the individual Czechia and Hungary cases concerning constitutional conventions, and if so, what explains these differences and what repercussions these differences have for the legal and political life of these countries. It shows that there are actually significant differences between these two countries. Czechia has embraced constitutional conventions – albeit in relatively few areas – and the Constitutional Court, as well as the Supreme Administrative Court, found some of them justiciable and even decisive for the outcome of some cases. In contrast, Hungary has so far resisted justiciability, as well as a thorough discussion of constitutional conventions.

Návaznosti

101002660, interní kód MU

Název: Informal Judicial Institutions: Invisible Determinants of Democratic Decay (Akronym: INFINITY)

Investor: Evropská unie, Informal Judicial Institutions: Invisible Determinants of Democratic Decay, ERC (Excellent Science)

Citovat

KOSAŘ, David a Attila VINCZE. Constitutional Conventions in Central Europe: When Two Are Doing the Same It Is Not Always the Same. In Nicholas Barry - Narelle Miragliotta - Zim Nwokora - Haig Patapan. Constitutional Conventions Theories, Practices and Dynamics. 1. vyd. London - New York: Routledge, 2025, s. 177-196. ISBN 978-1-032-82833-6. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003506577-10.

@inbook{2476497,
   author = {Kosař, David and Vincze, Attila},
   address = {London - New York},
   booktitle = {Constitutional Conventions Theories, Practices and Dynamics},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003506577-10},
   edition = {1},
   editor = {Nicholas Barry - Narelle Miragliotta - Zim Nwokora - Haig Patapan},
   keywords = {Constitutional conventions; unwritten law; informal institutions; settled practice; constitutional reason; civil law systems},
   howpublished = {tištěná verze "print"},
   language = {eng},
   location = {London - New York},
   isbn = {978-1-032-82833-6},
   pages = {177-196},
   publisher = {Routledge},
   title = {Constitutional Conventions in Central Europe: When Two Are Doing the Same It Is Not Always the Same},
   url = {https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003506577-10/constitutional-conventions-czechia-hungary-david-kosa%C5%99-attila-vincze},
   year = {2025}
}

TY  - CHAP
ID  - 2476497
AU  - Kosař, David - Vincze, Attila
PY  - 2025
TI  - Constitutional Conventions in Central Europe: When Two Are Doing the Same It Is Not Always the Same
VL  - Neuveden
PB  - Routledge
CY  - London - New York
SN  - 9781032828336
KW  - Constitutional conventions
KW  - unwritten law
KW  - informal institutions
KW  - settled practice
KW  - constitutional reason
KW  - civil law systems
UR  - https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003506577-10/constitutional-conventions-czechia-hungary-david-kosa%C5%99-attila-vincze
N2  - The aim of this chapter is thus to explore whether there are any differences between the individual Czechia and Hungary cases concerning constitutional conventions, and if so, what explains these differences and what repercussions these differences have for the legal and political life of these countries. It shows that there are actually significant differences between these two countries. Czechia has embraced constitutional conventions – albeit in relatively few areas – and the Constitutional Court, as well as the Supreme Administrative Court, found some of them justiciable and even decisive for the outcome of some cases. In contrast, Hungary has so far resisted justiciability, as well as a thorough discussion of constitutional conventions.
ER  -

KOSAŘ, David a Attila VINCZE. Constitutional Conventions in Central Europe: When Two Are Doing the Same It Is Not Always the Same. In Nicholas Barry - Narelle Miragliotta - Zim Nwokora - Haig Patapan. \textit{Constitutional Conventions Theories, Practices and Dynamics}. 1. vyd. London - New York: Routledge, 2025, s.~177-196. ISBN~978-1-032-82833-6. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003506577-10.

Přehled o publikaci