2026
Contrasting Approaches in the Implementation of GRADE Methodology in Guidelines for Haemophilia and Von Willebrand Disease
SKINNER, Mark W; Manuela ALBISETTI; Jesus ARDILA; Jan ASTERMARK; Jan BLATNÝ et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Contrasting Approaches in the Implementation of GRADE Methodology in Guidelines for Haemophilia and Von Willebrand Disease
Autoři
SKINNER, Mark W; Manuela ALBISETTI; Jesus ARDILA; Jan ASTERMARK; Jan BLATNÝ; Manuel CARCAO; Pratima CHOWDARY; Nathan T CONNELL; Miguel CRATO; Yesim DARGAUD; Roseline D'OIRON; Amy L DUNN; Miguel A ESCOBAR; Carmen ESCURIOLA-ETTINGSHAUSEN; Emna GOUIDER; Annie HARROCHE; Cedric HERMANS; Victor JIMENEZ-YUSTE; Radoslaw KACZMAREK; Gili KENET; Liane KHOO; Robert KLAMROTH; Florian LANGER; David LILLICRAP; Johnny MAHLANGU; Christoph MALE; Tadashi MATSUSHITA; Sandrine MEUNIER; Wolfgang MIESBACH; Beatrice NOLAN; Johannes OLDENBURG; Brian O'MAHONY; Margareth OZELO; Glenn F PIERCE; Gloria RAMOS; Michael RECHT; Olivia ROMERO-LUX; Dawn ROTELLINI; Rita C SANTORO; Tammuella C SINGLETON; Alok SRIVASTAVA; Sophie SUSEN; Kate TALKS; Huyen TRAN; Leonard A VALENTINO; Jerzy WINDYGA; Renchi YANG a Maria Elisa MANCUSO
Vydání
Haemophilia, HOBOKEN, Blackwell Science, 2026, 1351-8216
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30205 Hematology
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 3.000 v roce 2024
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ne
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
GRADE; guideline; haemophilia; ISTH; rare disease; von Willebrand disease
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 16. 2. 2026 12:24, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
IntroductionThe 2024 ISTH clinical practice guideline (CPG) for treatment of congenital haemophilia, the NBDF-McMaster Guideline on Care Models for Haemophilia Management, and ASH ISTH NBDF WFH guidelines on the diagnosis and management of VWD all utilised GRADE methodology.AimDiscuss missed opportunities and the methodological approach of the ISTH Guideline in contrast to how GRADE was previously applied in rare diseases.MethodsCritically analyse the methodology of each guideline along with best practices in the use of GRADE. Where applicable, the WFH Guidelines for the Management of Haemophilia were analysed.ResultsImportant differentiating features in applying GRADE were identified. Where a strong evidence base is lacking, data other than those from randomized controlled trials, which may not always be justified, need to be considered, including incorporation of outcomes important to people living with the disease. Justification and stakeholder input to prioritize questions requiring a new guideline, panel composition with necessary patient participation and content expertise were also found to be significant differentiating features.ConclusionThe puristic approach taken in the ISTH Guideline development process, without consideration of accepted adaptations to GRADE implementation, created a missed opportunity for progressing haemophilia care, leading to guideline recommendations that have been widely deemed invalid and obsolete by expert healthcare professionals and by those living with the condition, the very people who are expected to implement or bear the impact of the recommendations. Lessons learnt from this comparative analysis should guide future guideline development and encourage collaboration to further advance haemophilia.