Automating employment disputes: A case selection framework

J 2025

Automating employment disputes: A case selection framework

KRIŠTOFÍK, Andrej; Pavel LOUTOCKÝ; Anna BLECHOVÁ a Tereza NOVOTNÁ

Základní údaje

Originální název

Automating employment disputes: A case selection framework

Autoři

KRIŠTOFÍK, Andrej; Pavel LOUTOCKÝ ; Anna BLECHOVÁ a Tereza NOVOTNÁ

Vydání

Jusletter IT, Bern, Weblaw AG, 2025, 1664-848X

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50501 Law

Stát vydavatele

Švýcarsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Open access článku

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14220/25:00140678

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

DOI

https://doi.org/10.38023/b4812f30-6e4a-4347-8244-dff856d0b316

EID Scopus

2-s2.0-105013165703

Klíčová slova anglicky

artificial intelligence; court automation; eJustice; employment disputes

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 13. 3. 2026 13:34, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Anotace

V originále

The increasing volume of legal disputes, particularly within labour law, has overburdened judicial systems, extending case durations and undermining legal certainty for affected individuals. Recent technological advancements offer potential solutions for alleviating this load through automation and augmented decision-making processes. However, the integration of technology in labour dispute resolution must be approached cautiously, adhering to principles such as Susskind’s maxim, which emphasizes that any technology deployed should substantively improve legal processes. This article explores a structured framework for deploying automation within labour law, identifying case types suitable for automation based on factors like legal and technological complexity. It outlines the need for a multi-tiered approach that escalates from negotiation to binding decisions, tailored specifically for less complex, high-volume cases. The framework also highlights critical legal considerations, such as safeguarding fundamental rights, procedural due process, and human oversight, ensuring that automated systems do not compromise these protections. By establishing pilot cases within a controlled environment, we aim to ensure that the technology‘s application not only enhances efficiency but also respects legal standards and safeguards human dignity and autonomy in automated labour dispute resolution.

Návaznosti

101160528, interní kód MU

Název: I-tools to Design and Enhance Access to justice

Investor: Evropská unie, I-tools to Design and Enhance Access to justice, JUST

Citovat

KRIŠTOFÍK, Andrej; Pavel LOUTOCKÝ; Anna BLECHOVÁ a Tereza NOVOTNÁ. Automating employment disputes: A case selection framework. Jusletter IT. Bern: Weblaw AG, 2025, roč. 2025, č. 2025, s. 55-62. ISSN 1664-848X. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.38023/b4812f30-6e4a-4347-8244-dff856d0b316.

@article{2479543,
   author = {Krištofík, Andrej and Loutocký, Pavel and Blechová, Anna and Novotná, Tereza},
   article_location = {Bern},
   article_number = {2025},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.38023/b4812f30-6e4a-4347-8244-dff856d0b316},
   keywords = {artificial intelligence; court automation; eJustice; employment disputes},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1664-848X},
   journal = {Jusletter IT},
   title = {Automating employment disputes: A case selection framework},
   url = {https://jusletter-it.weblaw.ch/issues/2025/20-Februar-2025/automating-employmen_e4c33b0f98.html__ONCE&login=false},
   volume = {2025},
   year = {2025}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 2479543
AU  - Krištofík, Andrej - Loutocký, Pavel - Blechová, Anna - Novotná, Tereza
PY  - 2025
TI  - Automating employment disputes: A case selection framework
JF  - Jusletter IT
VL  - 2025
IS  - 2025
SP  - 55-62
EP  - 55-62
PB  - Weblaw AG
SN  - 1664848X
KW  - artificial intelligence
KW  - court automation
KW  - eJustice
KW  - employment disputes
UR  - https://jusletter-it.weblaw.ch/issues/2025/20-Februar-2025/automating-employmen_e4c33b0f98.html__ONCE&login=false
N2  - The increasing volume of legal disputes, particularly within labour law, has overburdened judicial systems, extending case durations and undermining legal certainty for affected individuals. Recent technological advancements offer potential solutions for alleviating this load through automation and augmented decision-making processes. However, the integration of technology in labour dispute resolution must be approached cautiously, adhering to principles such as Susskind’s maxim, which emphasizes that any technology deployed should substantively improve legal processes. This article explores a structured framework for deploying automation within labour law, identifying case types suitable for automation based on factors like legal and technological complexity. It outlines the need for a multi-tiered approach that escalates from negotiation to binding decisions, tailored specifically for less complex, high-volume cases. The framework also highlights critical legal considerations, such as safeguarding fundamental rights, procedural due process, and human oversight, ensuring that automated systems do not compromise these protections. By establishing pilot cases within a controlled environment, we aim to ensure that the technology‘s application not only enhances efficiency but also respects legal standards and safeguards human dignity and autonomy in automated labour dispute resolution.
ER  -

KRIŠTOFÍK, Andrej; Pavel LOUTOCKÝ; Anna BLECHOVÁ a Tereza NOVOTNÁ. Automating employment disputes: A case selection framework. \textit{Jusletter IT}. Bern: Weblaw AG, 2025, roč.~2025, č.~2025, s.~55-62. ISSN~1664-848X. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.38023/b4812f30-6e4a-4347-8244-dff856d0b316.

Přehled o publikaci