2025
Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of Lophanthus and its allies (Lamiaceae)
MOAZZENI, Hamid; Atefeh PIRANI; Farshid MEMARIANI; Saeide HOSSEINI; Mohammad Bagher ERFANIAN et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of Lophanthus and its allies (Lamiaceae)
Autoři
MOAZZENI, Hamid; Atefeh PIRANI; Farshid MEMARIANI; Saeide HOSSEINI; Mohammad Bagher ERFANIAN; Mohammad Reza AMIRI; Ernst VITEK; Mohammad Reza JOHARCHI; Klaus MUMMENHOFF a Martin LYSÁK
Vydání
Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, Elsevier, 2025, 1433-8319
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
10611 Plant sciences, botany
Stát vydavatele
Německo
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 2.900 v roce 2024
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14310/25:00140700
Organizační jednotka
Přírodovědecká fakulta
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
Biogeography; Hymenocrater; Marmoritis; Molecular phylogeny; Taxonomy
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 18. 3. 2025 08:55, Mgr. Marie Novosadová Šípková, DiS.
Anotace
V originále
As one of the taxonomically complicated groups of the subfamily Nepetoideae (Lamiaceae), the Hymenocrater+Lophanthus+Marmoritis clade (Lophanthus s.l. clade) consists of approximately 40 species distributed from eastern to southwestern Asia. Due to the sparse taxon sampling, previous molecular and morphological studies have not been capable of rendering the phylogenetic position of this clade and relationships of its taxa. We performed a comprehensive molecular study of the Hymenocrater+Lophanthus+Marmoritis clade, including an extensive taxon sampling, using nrDNA (ITS and ETS) and cpDNA (trnL-trnF, rps16, and rpl32-trnL) sequences. Bayesian and maximum likelihood approaches were used to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships, dating of diversification, and historical biogeography of this clade. Although the present study confirms the polyphyly of Hymenocrater, Lophanthus and Marmoritis, the phylogenetic results do not confirm the unity of Lophanthus and its allies with Nepeta. Therefore, the generic delimitation of Lophanthus s.l. and Nepeta is yet to be determined, requiring an examination and assessment of adding a large number of Nepeta species and their close relatives. Our results also indicate the need to redefine Lophanthus sensu Budantsev more broadly as Lophanthus s.l. by synonymizing Hymenocrater and Marmoritis within Lophanthus. Two morphological synapomorphies, i.e., the resupinate corolla and an annulate hairy calyx tube in the middle or throat, support this unity. Dating and biogeographical analyses confirm that Lophanthus s.l. originated in the eastern Irano-Turanian floristic region in the late Miocene and later migrated to the central part of this region.