In vivo versus in vitro sperm selection

J 2024

In vivo versus in vitro sperm selection

JEŠETA, Michal; Jana ANTALIKOVA; Adéla DOUBRAVSKÁ; Lenka MEKIŇOVÁ; Bartosz KEMPISTY et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

In vivo versus in vitro sperm selection

Autoři

JEŠETA, Michal; Jana ANTALIKOVA; Adéla DOUBRAVSKÁ; Lenka MEKIŇOVÁ; Bartosz KEMPISTY; Pavel VENTRUBA a Igor CRHA

Vydání

JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, SINGAPORE, MRE PRESS, 2024, 1875-6867

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30304 Public and environmental health

Stát vydavatele

Singapur

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 0.600

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/24:00139161

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

Spermatozoa; IVF; Sperm separation; ICSI; Microfluid separation; Thermotaxis; Chemotaxis

Štítky

14110240, 14110611, rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 25. 3. 2025 13:35, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

The separation of human spermatozoa is an important step in therapy of human infertility. Given that male fertility is decreasing and, as a result, fertilization techniques based on microinjection of sperm into the cytoplasm are being used more intensively, this question is becoming increasingly relevant. In recent years, microfluidic sperm processing techniques have been increasingly used. These methods are simple and easy to use, however, the question is to what extent they select the correct sperm. They are essentially based mainly on motility and do not reflect other navigational approaches such as chemotaxis, thermotaxis or rheotaxis. This review compares traditional, advances and novel in vitro methods of sperm separation which are commonly used during human infertility therapy in context of in vivo sperm separation in female reproductive system.

Citovat

JEŠETA, Michal; Jana ANTALIKOVA; Adéla DOUBRAVSKÁ; Lenka MEKIŇOVÁ; Bartosz KEMPISTY; Pavel VENTRUBA a Igor CRHA. In vivo versus in vitro sperm selection. JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH. SINGAPORE: MRE PRESS, 2024, roč. 21, č. 2, s. 1-10. ISSN 1875-6867. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.22514/jomh.2025.016.

@article{2486597,
   author = {Ješeta, Michal and Antalikova, Jana and Doubravská, Adéla and Mekiňová, Lenka and Kempisty, Bartosz and Ventruba, Pavel and Crha, Igor},
   article_location = {SINGAPORE},
   article_number = {2},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.22514/jomh.2025.016},
   keywords = {Spermatozoa; IVF; Sperm separation; ICSI; Microfluid separation; Thermotaxis; Chemotaxis},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1875-6867},
   journal = {JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH},
   title = {In vivo versus in vitro sperm selection},
   url = {https://www.jomh.org/articles/10.22514/jomh.2025.016},
   volume = {21},
   year = {2024}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 2486597
AU  - Ješeta, Michal - Antalikova, Jana - Doubravská, Adéla - Mekiňová, Lenka - Kempisty, Bartosz - Ventruba, Pavel - Crha, Igor
PY  - 2024
TI  - In vivo versus in vitro sperm selection
JF  - JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH
VL  - 21
IS  - 2
SP  - 1-10
EP  - 1-10
PB  - MRE PRESS
SN  - 18756867
KW  - Spermatozoa
KW  - IVF
KW  - Sperm separation
KW  - ICSI
KW  - Microfluid separation
KW  - Thermotaxis
KW  - Chemotaxis
UR  - https://www.jomh.org/articles/10.22514/jomh.2025.016
N2  - The separation of human spermatozoa is an important step in therapy of human infertility. Given that male fertility is decreasing and, as a result, fertilization techniques based on microinjection of sperm into the cytoplasm are being used more intensively, this question is becoming increasingly relevant. In recent years, microfluidic sperm processing techniques have been increasingly used. These methods are simple and easy to use, however, the question is to what extent they select the correct sperm. They are essentially based mainly on motility and do not reflect other navigational approaches such as chemotaxis, thermotaxis or rheotaxis. This review compares traditional, advances and novel in vitro methods of sperm separation which are commonly used during human infertility therapy in context of in vivo sperm separation in female reproductive system.
ER  -

JEŠETA, Michal; Jana ANTALIKOVA; Adéla DOUBRAVSKÁ; Lenka MEKIŇOVÁ; Bartosz KEMPISTY; Pavel VENTRUBA a Igor CRHA. In vivo versus in vitro sperm selection. \textit{JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH}. SINGAPORE: MRE PRESS, 2024, roč.~21, č.~2, s.~1-10. ISSN~1875-6867. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.22514/jomh.2025.016.

Přehled o publikaci