Multidimensional meta-argumentative analysis of disagreements –
selected case studies

k 2023

Multidimensional meta-argumentative analysis of disagreements – selected case studies

URBAŃSKI, Mariusz; Tomáš ONDRÁČEK a Paweł ŁUPKOWSKI

Základní údaje

Originální název

Multidimensional meta-argumentative analysis of disagreements – selected case studies

Autoři

URBAŃSKI, Mariusz; Tomáš ONDRÁČEK a Paweł ŁUPKOWSKI

Vydání

The Eight International Conference on Philosophy of Language and Linguistics (PhiLang 2023), 2023

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Prezentace na konferencích

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Organizační jednotka

Ekonomicko-správní fakulta

Klíčová slova česky

question dependency; question feeders; public debate; disagreements

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 26. 5. 2025 09:24, Mgr. et Mgr. Tomáš Ondráček, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

In this paper we propose a method which allows for multidimensional metaargumentative representation of public debates. The model involves deontic, ontological, and ethical aspects. These three axes determine the crucial dimensions of the discussion, which are brought about by relevant questions. Ontological axis is focused on the questions concerning facts (“Is X the case?”). Ethical axis captures concerns about ethical and moral standpoints regarding a given issue (“Is X good or fair or just?”). Deontological axis represents practical reasoning in the sense that it is focused on actual doings of parties (“Should X be done?”). Their intersections represent issues being considered within the discussion, each of which may be approached from one of these three perspectives. We reconstruct the public debate in the tree-like structure representing the meta-level of argumentation. The point of departure is the time-line of events concerning a given topic. Nodes of the resulting tree-like structure are questions, representing the consecutive issues being considered. The rationale for a question to appear in the structure is based either on the relation of dependency between questions or on the presence of an appropriate external nonlinguistic feeder (action or event). We will illustrate such analyses with case studies of the Turów mine dispute (between Poland and Czech Republic) as well as the debates concerning the so-called Lex Czarnek (educational reform) and the abortion law changes in Poland.

Citovat

URBAŃSKI, Mariusz; Tomáš ONDRÁČEK a Paweł ŁUPKOWSKI. Multidimensional meta-argumentative analysis of disagreements – selected case studies. In The Eight International Conference on Philosophy of Language and Linguistics (PhiLang 2023). 2023.

@proceedings{2499098,
   author = {Urbański, Mariusz and Ondráček, Tomáš and Łupkowski, Paweł},
   booktitle = {The Eight International Conference on Philosophy of Language and Linguistics (PhiLang 2023)},
   language = {eng},
   title = {Multidimensional meta-argumentative analysis of disagreements – selected case studies},
   year = {2023}
}

TY  - CONF
ID  - 2499098
AU  - Urbański, Mariusz - Ondráček, Tomáš - Łupkowski, Paweł
PY  - 2023
TI  - Multidimensional meta-argumentative analysis of disagreements – selected case studies
N2  - In this paper we propose a method which allows for multidimensional metaargumentative representation of public debates. The model involves deontic, ontological, and ethical aspects. These three axes determine the crucial dimensions of the discussion, which are brought about by relevant questions. Ontological axis is focused on the questions concerning facts (“Is X the case?”). Ethical axis captures concerns about ethical and moral standpoints regarding a given issue (“Is X good or fair or just?”). Deontological axis represents practical reasoning in the sense that it is focused on actual doings of parties (“Should X be done?”). Their intersections represent issues being considered within the discussion, each of which may be approached from one of these three perspectives. We reconstruct the public debate in the tree-like structure representing the meta-level of argumentation. The point of departure is the time-line of events concerning a given topic. Nodes of the resulting tree-like structure are questions, representing the consecutive issues being considered. The rationale for a question to appear in the structure is based either on the relation of dependency between questions or on the presence of an appropriate external nonlinguistic feeder (action or event). We will illustrate such analyses with case studies of the Turów mine dispute (between Poland and Czech Republic) as well as the debates concerning the so-called Lex Czarnek (educational reform) and the abortion law changes in Poland.
ER  -

URBA$\backslash$'NSKI, Mariusz; Tomáš ONDRÁČEK a Paweł ŁUPKOWSKI. Multidimensional meta-argumentative analysis of disagreements – selected case studies. In \textit{The Eight International Conference on Philosophy of Language and Linguistics (PhiLang 2023)}. 2023.

Přehled o publikaci