Comparison of silicone impressions with intraoral 3D scans in
newborns with cleft lip and palate

J 2025

Comparison of silicone impressions with intraoral 3D scans in newborns with cleft lip and palate

KOŠKOVÁ, Olga; Libor BORAK; Wanda URBANOVA; Alena BRYŠOVÁ; Magda NOVAKOVA et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Comparison of silicone impressions with intraoral 3D scans in newborns with cleft lip and palate

Autoři

KOŠKOVÁ, Olga; Libor BORAK; Wanda URBANOVA; Alena BRYŠOVÁ; Magda NOVAKOVA; Michaela RICHTROVÁ; Libor STREIT; Petr ŠTOURAČ a Petr MARCIAN

Vydání

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, NEW YORK, Elsevier Inc. 2025, 0022-3913

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30212 Surgery

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 4.800 v roce 2024

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/25:00141767

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

cleft lip; palate; newborns; intraoral 3D scans; silicone impressions

Štítky

14110130, 14110229, 14110322, 14110528, rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 29. 1. 2026 11:12, Mgr. Eva Suchánková

Anotace

V originále

Statement of problem. Intraoral scanning is currently becoming the standard method for imaging the maxilla in patients with cleft lip and palate. However, the reliability of intraoral scans compared with traditional conventional impression methods has not yet been sufficiently described and examined in detail in newborns with severe types of cleft lip and palate. Purpose. The purpose of this clinical study was to assess the reliability and agreement between intraoral scanning and traditional impression methods for maxillary measurements in newborns with unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate (U/BCLP). A secondary aim was to evaluate the consistency of maxillary measurements obtained with and without general anesthesia. Material and methods. Six newborns with cleft lip and palate underwent 4 maxillary impression methods (silicone impression and 3-dimensional (3D) scan, with and without anesthesia). Intra-and inter-observer reliability was assessed by 3 clinicians using intraclass correlation coefficient, median absolute deviation, and median relative deviation (alpha=.05). Results. The intraclass correlation coefficient values for both inter-observer and intra-observer reliability indicated excellent agreement (ICC>.90, P<.05) for maxillary dimension measurements. Acceptable variability was observed because of differences in reference point identification by clinicians and across data collection methods. Conclusions. When assessing the maxilla in U/BCLP patients, both intraoral scanner and traditional impression techniques showed excellent reliability and agreement in measurements, whether performed while the newborns were awake or under general anesthesia. (J Prosthet Dent 2025;134:275-282)

Návaznosti

MUNI/A/1771/2024, interní kód MU

Název: Optimalizace bezpečnosti intenzivní a perioperační péče III

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Optimalizace bezpečnosti intenzivní a perioperační péče III

MUNI/A/1782/2024, interní kód MU

Název: Inovace v popáleninové medicíně a rekonstrukční plastické chirurgii II

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Inovace v popáleninové medicíně a rekonstrukční plastické chirurgii II

Citovat

KOŠKOVÁ, Olga; Libor BORAK; Wanda URBANOVA; Alena BRYŠOVÁ; Magda NOVAKOVA; Michaela RICHTROVÁ; Libor STREIT; Petr ŠTOURAČ a Petr MARCIAN. Comparison of silicone impressions with intraoral 3D scans in newborns with cleft lip and palate. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. NEW YORK: Elsevier Inc., 2025, roč. 134, č. 1, s. 275-282. ISSN 0022-3913. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.02.054.

@article{2511764,
   author = {Košková, Olga and Borak, Libor and Urbanova, Wanda and Bryšová, Alena and Novakova, Magda and Richtrová, Michaela and Streit, Libor and Štourač, Petr and Marcian, Petr},
   article_location = {NEW YORK},
   article_number = {1},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.02.054},
   keywords = {cleft lip; palate; newborns; intraoral 3D scans; silicone impressions},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0022-3913},
   journal = {Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry},
   title = {Comparison of silicone impressions with intraoral 3D scans in newborns with cleft lip and palate},
   url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391325001970?via%3Dihub},
   volume = {134},
   year = {2025}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 2511764
AU  - Košková, Olga - Borak, Libor - Urbanova, Wanda - Bryšová, Alena - Novakova, Magda - Richtrová, Michaela - Streit, Libor - Štourač, Petr - Marcian, Petr
PY  - 2025
TI  - Comparison of silicone impressions with intraoral 3D scans in newborns with cleft lip and palate
JF  - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
VL  - 134
IS  - 1
SP  - 275-282
EP  - 275-282
PB  - Elsevier Inc.
SN  - 00223913
KW  - cleft lip
KW  - palate
KW  - newborns
KW  - intraoral 3D scans
KW  - silicone impressions
UR  - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391325001970?via%3Dihub
N2  - Statement of problem. Intraoral scanning is currently becoming the standard method for imaging the maxilla in patients with cleft lip and palate. However, the reliability of intraoral scans compared with traditional conventional impression methods has not yet been sufficiently described and examined in detail in newborns with severe types of cleft lip and palate. Purpose. The purpose of this clinical study was to assess the reliability and agreement between intraoral scanning and traditional impression methods for maxillary measurements in newborns with unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate (U/BCLP). A secondary aim was to evaluate the consistency of maxillary measurements obtained with and without general anesthesia. Material and methods. Six newborns with cleft lip and palate underwent 4 maxillary impression methods (silicone impression and 3-dimensional (3D) scan, with and without anesthesia). Intra-and inter-observer reliability was assessed by 3 clinicians using intraclass correlation coefficient, median absolute deviation, and median relative deviation (alpha=.05). Results. The intraclass correlation coefficient values for both inter-observer and intra-observer reliability indicated excellent agreement (ICC>.90, P<.05) for maxillary dimension measurements. Acceptable variability was observed because of differences in reference point identification by clinicians and across data collection methods. Conclusions. When assessing the maxilla in U/BCLP patients, both intraoral scanner and traditional impression techniques showed excellent reliability and agreement in measurements, whether performed while the newborns were awake or under general anesthesia. (J Prosthet Dent 2025;134:275-282)
ER  -

KOŠKOVÁ, Olga; Libor BORAK; Wanda URBANOVA; Alena BRYŠOVÁ; Magda NOVAKOVA; Michaela RICHTROVÁ; Libor STREIT; Petr ŠTOURAČ a Petr MARCIAN. Comparison of silicone impressions with intraoral 3D scans in newborns with cleft lip and palate. \textit{Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry}. NEW YORK: Elsevier Inc., 2025, roč.~134, č.~1, s.~275-282. ISSN~0022-3913. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.02.054.

Přehled o publikaci