2025
Detection and quantification of the canine DNA in meat DNA mixes and meat mixtures by real time PCR and digital droplet PCR
NESVADBOVA, Michaela; Radka DZIEDZINSKA; Vladimir BABAK a Petr KRÁLÍKZákladní údaje
Originální název
Detection and quantification of the canine DNA in meat DNA mixes and meat mixtures by real time PCR and digital droplet PCR
Autoři
NESVADBOVA, Michaela; Radka DZIEDZINSKA; Vladimir BABAK a Petr KRÁLÍK
Vydání
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, Elsevier, 2025, 0889-1575
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
21101 Food and beverages
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 4.600 v roce 2024
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14310/25:00142388
Organizační jednotka
Přírodovědecká fakulta
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
qPCR; Quantification; Meat species content
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 29. 10. 2025 10:55, Mgr. Marie Novosadová Šípková, DiS.
Anotace
V originále
Accurate detection of animal species in meat products is essential for food safety, regulatory compliance, and the prevention of food fraud. This study presents the development and validation of a modified quadruplex quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay and singleplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) for the detection and quantification of canine DNA in meat and DNA mixtures. Two- and three-species samples containing canine, pork, and chicken components (0.1 %-100 %) were prepared, including heat-treated variants. A simplified quantification approach using a single 100 % DNA reference diluted to 10 ng/mu L was applied in both methods. Results from qPCR and ddPCR were statistically evaluated using ANOVA, RMSD, and coefficient of variation (CV). Both methods yielded accurate results across most concentration ranges, with no significant differences in calculated percentages. However, qPCR exhibited significantly higher variability than ddPCR, especially at extreme concentrations (<1 % and >99 %). ddPCR showed superior performance in three-species mixtures and yielded lower RMSD values overall. Despite higher variability at detection limits inherent to PCR technology, both methods are suitable for routine quantification of canine DNA in meat products. The study confirms that a single-reference standard is a cost-effective and reliable alternative to full calibration curves for species quantification.