2025
Comparison of hybrid guided home-based and outpatient rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial
DOSBABA, Filip; Vojtěch ŠENKÝŘ; Daniela VLAŽNÁ; Jitka MINÁRIKOVÁ; Marketa NEVELIKOVA et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Comparison of hybrid guided home-based and outpatient rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial
Autoři
DOSBABA, Filip; Vojtěch ŠENKÝŘ; Daniela VLAŽNÁ; Jitka MINÁRIKOVÁ; Marketa NEVELIKOVA; Michaela SLÁDEČKOVÁ; Peter KRKOŠKA; Blanka ADAMOVÁ; Jing Jing SU a Ladislav BAŤALÍK ORCID
Vydání
JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, AMSTERDAM, ELSEVIER, 2025, 1360-8592
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30210 Clinical neurology
Stát vydavatele
Nizozemské království
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 1.400 v roce 2024
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/25:00142711
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
Chronic low back pain; Hybrid rehabilitation; Home-based exercise; Telemonitoring; Trunk endurance; Pain; Patient adherence; Quality of life; Safety
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 25. 11. 2025 13:45, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Background: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a leading cause of disability globally, often requiring multidisciplinary management. Hybrid rehabilitation models, combining home-based exercises with telemonitoring and periodic check-ins, may offer improved outcomes and adherence compared to standard outpatient care. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a hybrid guided home-based rehabilitation (HGHR) compared to standard outpatient rehabilitation (SOR) in patients with CLBP. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 56 participants assigned to a HGHR or a SOR group. Both groups completed an 18-week intervention with seven scheduled physiotherapy sessions. The HGHR group performed structured home-based exercises supported by weekly phone monitoring and in-person check-ins, while the SOR group attended traditional supervised outpatient sessions. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, after the 18-week intervention, and at the end of a 24-week follow-up period (week 42 in total). Results: At 42 weeks, the HGHR group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in trunk extensor endurance (mean difference: +34.3 s; p = 0.009; Hedges' g = 0.688) and pain reduction (mean difference: 1.67 points; p = 0.001; Hedges' g = 0.910) compared to the SOR group. No significant between-group differences were found in disability or most SF-36 quality of life domains. Adherence exceeded 89 % in both groups, with no serious adverse events reported. Conclusions: Hybrid guided home-based rehabilitation is effective in improving trunk endurance and reducing pain in patients with CLBP. These benefits were maintained up to 24 weeks post-intervention. Future research should explore long-term cost-effectiveness and integration of psychological support to further enhance outcomes.