2025
Cambyses’ Negative Reputation and Darius : An Example of Royal Judges in Herodotus’ Histories
HABAJ, MichalZákladní údaje
Originální název
Cambyses’ Negative Reputation and Darius : An Example of Royal Judges in Herodotus’ Histories
Autoři
Vydání
Romance on the Nile. The Ancient Novel in Egypt – Egypt in the Ancient Novel, Berlin, Německo, 10-12 September 2025, 2025
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Prezentace na konferencích
Obor
60101 History
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ne
Organizační jednotka
Filozofická fakulta
Klíčová slova anglicky
Herodotus; Cambyses; ancient Egypt
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam
Změněno: 8. 1. 2026 13:35, doc. Mgr. Michal Habaj, PhD.
Anotace
V originále
This article revisits the origins of Cambyses’ controversial reputation and builds on the argument that this reputation was shaped, at least in part, by Darius’ account of Cambyses’ reign. It focuses on two parallel episodes in Herodotus’ Histories, in which Cambyses and Darius are placed in comparable situations involving the punishment of royal judges. Despite the initial similarity, the stories diverge significantly: while Cambyses orders the brutal execution of a judge, Darius ultimately refrains from carrying out a similar sentence. Through a comparison with the royal ideology articulated in Darius’ inscriptions, the study argues that Herodotus’ narratives reflect Darius’ self-presentation as a just ruler, with Cambyses’ portrayal serving as a deliberate foil designed to enhance Darius’ image. The analysis further demonstrates that, although Herodotus preserved essential elements of the original narratives, he reframed their core message—the concept of royal justice as the guarantor of order—in line with his own understanding of autocracy.
Návaznosti
| MUNI/A/1696/2024, interní kód MU |
|