2025
One year follow up comparison of three advanced hybrid closed loop systems in adolescent patients with type 1 diabetes
KONEČNÁ, Petra; Jana VYŽRÁLKOVÁ; Beáta KREJČÍŘOVÁ; Klára HÁJKOVÁ; Dagmar PROCHÁZKOVÁ et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
One year follow up comparison of three advanced hybrid closed loop systems in adolescent patients with type 1 diabetes
Autoři
KONEČNÁ, Petra; Jana VYŽRÁLKOVÁ; Beáta KREJČÍŘOVÁ; Klára HÁJKOVÁ a Dagmar PROCHÁZKOVÁ
Vydání
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 2025
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Konferenční abstrakt
Obor
30202 Endocrinology and metabolism
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ne
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
Klíčová slova česky
hybrid closed loop systems adolescent patients type 1 diabetes
Změněno: 19. 3. 2026 15:13, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Background: MiniMed 780G, Control-IQ and CamAPS FX are currently the three advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) systems most commonly used in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in the Czech Republic. Adolescents and young adults are the group with the highest HbA1C values, often unable to reach recommended glycemic targets. Aim: The aim of the present work was to retrospectively compare data from continuous glucose monitoring in adolescent patients one year after initiation of AHCL (MiniMed 780G, Control-IQ and CamAPS FX) therapy. Method: Fifty-five adolescent (19 MiniMed 780G system, 15 Control-IQ , 21 CamAPS FX), M: F 23: 22, mean age 15.7 years) with T1D, previously treated with Predictive Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS) systems or Multiple Daily Injections (MDI) and then upgraded to AHCL have been enrolled. Glycemic control (GMI and time in ranges, mean glucose value, standard deviation, coefficient of variation) and AHCL characteristic (total insulin dose, basal/bolus ratio) were analyzed at baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months after initiation of the AHCL system. Results: For all AHCL systems, there was a significant increase in time in range (TIR) after 3 months of therapy from 65.1 to 80.1 % (p < 0.0004) and from 74.8 to 79.6 % (p < 0.021 ) and 64.6 to 79.6 %(p < 0.001). The MiniMed 780 and the CamAPS FX group achieved significant increase in TIR over the year as well as a reduction in total time below range (TBR). For the CamAPS group, there was also a significant reduction in TAR and the Tandem Control-IQ group, there was a significant reduction in TBR during the whole year. In patients treated with the MiniMed 780G insulin pump, there were significant reductions in TBR during 6 and 12 months from the start of the treatment compared to the CamAPS group. Severe hypoglycaemia and diabetic ketoacidosis were not observed. Conclusion: All AHCL systems are safe and lead to improved glycemic control in adolescent patients with T1D especially during the first 3 months after initiation of AHCL therapy.