2025
The Aesthetic Ideas of F. M. Klácel
LEE, LenkaZákladní údaje
Originální název
The Aesthetic Ideas of F. M. Klácel
Autoři
Vydání
Annual Coffee Conference of the Society of Dialogical Aesthetics 2025, Helsinki, Finsko, 2025
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Prezentace na konferencích
Obor
60301 Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Stát vydavatele
Finsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ne
Organizační jednotka
Filozofická fakulta
Klíčová slova anglicky
Klacel; utopia; aesthetics; vesmernost
Změněno: 22. 1. 2026 21:06, Mgr. Lenka Lee, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
The lecture examines the utopian visions of František Matouš Klácel (1808–1882), an Augustinian monk from Brno. It analyses the philosophical and historical influences on his ideas, as well as his efforts to implement them. Klácel’s utopian concepts were influenced by earlier social reformers such as Saint-Simon, Fourier, the Unity of the Brethren, and Comenius. However, he grounded these ideas in his own philosophical framework known as *vesměrnost*, which refers to cosmopolitism or universal harmony. Over time, this concept evolved from simply meaning cosmopolitanism to embodying a broader vision of universal unity that includes all of existence. Klácel’s utopian aspirations led him to establish the Českomoravské bratrstvo (Czech-Moravian Brotherhood) in 1848, a small intellectual circle that sought to promote ethical values and social justice. Later, in 1869, he emigrated to the United States, where he attempted to found ideal communities called Svojanovs—self-sufficient, egalitarian societies governed by principles of collective ownership, gender equality, and communal labour. Despite his efforts, these initiatives struggled to gain traction, hindered by ideological rigidity, communication barriers, and the practical difficulties of implementation. The lecture highlights Klácel’s reliance on voluntary participation, his rejection of organized religion, and his belief in social progress through education and cooperation. While he found some resonance among freethinkers and Czech immigrants in America, his utopian projects ultimately failed to materialize on a larger scale. His legacy, however, remains significant as an intellectual who sought to merge philosophy, ethics, and social practice into a unified vision for a better world.
Návaznosti
| MUNI/A/1710/2024, interní kód MU |
|