National-, institutional-, and individual-level determinants of
psychiatric research excellence: Analysis of Stanford-Elsevier
lists of the top 2 % scholars worldwide (2017-2023)

J 2026

National-, institutional-, and individual-level determinants of psychiatric research excellence: Analysis of Stanford-Elsevier lists of the top 2 % scholars worldwide (2017-2023)

RIAD, Abanoub; Muhammad ALKASABY; Nisarat CHANGCHROENKUL a Michal KOŠČÍK

Základní údaje

Originální název

National-, institutional-, and individual-level determinants of psychiatric research excellence: Analysis of Stanford-Elsevier lists of the top 2 % scholars worldwide (2017-2023)

Autoři

RIAD, Abanoub; Muhammad ALKASABY; Nisarat CHANGCHROENKUL a Michal KOŠČÍK

Vydání

Asian Journal of Psychiatry, AMSTERDAM, ELSEVIER, 2026, 1876-2018

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30215 Psychiatry

Stát vydavatele

Nizozemské království

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 4.500 v roce 2024

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

Academia; Bibliometrics; Gender Equity; Global Health; Macroeconomic FactorsMental Disorders; Mental Health Services; Psychiatry; Research Personnel

Štítky

14110525, rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 8. 4. 2026 13:16, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

Background Research excellence is increasingly used as a benchmark for academic evaluation in medical sciences, including psychiatry. However, bibliometric analyses often prioritize productivity over quality. This study examined national, institutional, and individual determinants of psychiatric research excellence using a multi-level ecological framework. Methods We analyzed the Stanford–Elsevier Lists of the top 2 % scholars (2017–2023), incorporating 51 independent variables. These included: (a) national determinants grouped into five domains (mental healthcare, gender equity, socioeconomic development, budgetary policies, and disease burden), (b) institutional factors derived from global and discipline-specific rankings, and (c) individual factors of gender and academic age. The primary outcome was the number of excellent psychiatric scholars (EPS), with secondary indicators including citation counts, modified H-index, composite score, and self-citation share. Results Psychiatric research excellence was concentrated in high-income, English-speaking countries, with significant institutional elitism. A small number of institutions hosted a disproportionate share of EPS. Gender disparities persisted, with female representation negatively associated with national gender gaps in employment and education, but positively linked to government spending on education. Academic age positively correlated with citation-based performance metrics. Multivariable models confirmed the explanatory roles of gender, academic age, official language, gender equity, and human development. Conclusion Psychiatric research excellence reflects systemic advantages related to income, language, institutional prestige, and gender equity. Equitable funding, support for emerging research environments, and expanded international collaboration are essential to fostering broader participation in high-impact psychiatric research.

Návaznosti

LX22NPO5101, projekt VaV

Název: Národní institut pro výzkum socioekonomických dopadů nemocí a systémových rizik (Akronym: SYRI)

Investor: Ministerstvo školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy ČR, Národní institut pro výzkum socioekonomických dopadů nemocí a systémových rizik, 5.1 EXCELES

Citovat

RIAD, Abanoub; Muhammad ALKASABY; Nisarat CHANGCHROENKUL a Michal KOŠČÍK. National-, institutional-, and individual-level determinants of psychiatric research excellence: Analysis of Stanford-Elsevier lists of the top 2 % scholars worldwide (2017-2023). Asian Journal of Psychiatry. AMSTERDAM: ELSEVIER, 2026, roč. 116, February 2026, s. 1-22. ISSN 1876-2018. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2025.104826.

@article{2544921,
   author = {Riad, Abanoub and Alkasaby, Muhammad and Changchroenkul, Nisarat and Koščík, Michal},
   article_location = {AMSTERDAM},
   article_number = {February 2026},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2025.104826},
   keywords = {Academia; Bibliometrics; Gender Equity; Global Health; Macroeconomic FactorsMental Disorders; Mental Health Services; Psychiatry; Research Personnel},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1876-2018},
   journal = {Asian Journal of Psychiatry},
   title = {National-, institutional-, and individual-level determinants of psychiatric research excellence: Analysis of Stanford-Elsevier lists of the top 2 % scholars worldwide (2017-2023)},
   url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201825004691?via%3Dihub},
   volume = {116},
   year = {2026}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 2544921
AU  - Riad, Abanoub - Alkasaby, Muhammad - Changchroenkul, Nisarat - Koščík, Michal
PY  - 2026
TI  - National-, institutional-, and individual-level determinants of psychiatric research excellence: Analysis of Stanford-Elsevier lists of the top 2 % scholars worldwide (2017-2023)
JF  - Asian Journal of Psychiatry
VL  - 116
IS  - February 2026
SP  - 1-22
EP  - 1-22
PB  - ELSEVIER
SN  - 18762018
KW  - Academia
KW  - Bibliometrics
KW  - Gender Equity
KW  - Global Health
KW  - Macroeconomic FactorsMental Disorders
KW  - Mental Health Services
KW  - Psychiatry
KW  - Research Personnel
UR  - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201825004691?via%3Dihub
N2  - Background Research excellence is increasingly used as a benchmark for academic evaluation in medical sciences, including psychiatry. However, bibliometric analyses often prioritize productivity over quality. This study examined national, institutional, and individual determinants of psychiatric research excellence using a multi-level ecological framework. Methods We analyzed the Stanford–Elsevier Lists of the top 2 % scholars (2017–2023), incorporating 51 independent variables. These included: (a) national determinants grouped into five domains (mental healthcare, gender equity, socioeconomic development, budgetary policies, and disease burden), (b) institutional factors derived from global and discipline-specific rankings, and (c) individual factors of gender and academic age. The primary outcome was the number of excellent psychiatric scholars (EPS), with secondary indicators including citation counts, modified H-index, composite score, and self-citation share. Results Psychiatric research excellence was concentrated in high-income, English-speaking countries, with significant institutional elitism. A small number of institutions hosted a disproportionate share of EPS. Gender disparities persisted, with female representation negatively associated with national gender gaps in employment and education, but positively linked to government spending on education. Academic age positively correlated with citation-based performance metrics. Multivariable models confirmed the explanatory roles of gender, academic age, official language, gender equity, and human development. Conclusion Psychiatric research excellence reflects systemic advantages related to income, language, institutional prestige, and gender equity. Equitable funding, support for emerging research environments, and expanded international collaboration are essential to fostering broader participation in high-impact psychiatric research.
ER  -

RIAD, Abanoub; Muhammad ALKASABY; Nisarat CHANGCHROENKUL a Michal KOŠČÍK. National-, institutional-, and individual-level determinants of psychiatric research excellence: Analysis of Stanford-Elsevier lists of the top 2 \%{} scholars worldwide (2017-2023). \textit{Asian Journal of Psychiatry}. AMSTERDAM: ELSEVIER, 2026, roč.~116, February 2026, s.~1-22. ISSN~1876-2018. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2025.104826.

Přehled o publikaci