J 2026

Relationship between fibula free flap complications and dental implant outcomes: a retrospective cohort study

ATTIA, Sameh; Michael KNITSCHKE; Abanoub RIAD; Mohamed MEKHEMAR; Kim Natalie STOLTE et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Relationship between fibula free flap complications and dental implant outcomes: a retrospective cohort study

Autoři

ATTIA, Sameh; Michael KNITSCHKE; Abanoub RIAD; Mohamed MEKHEMAR a Kim Natalie STOLTE

Vydání

Frontiers in Oral Health, LAUSANNE, FRONTIERS MEDIA SA, 2026, 2673-4842

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30208 Dentistry, oral surgery and medicine

Stát vydavatele

Švýcarsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 3.100 v roce 2024

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

EID Scopus

Klíčová slova anglicky

fibula free flap; dental implants; surgical complications; oral rehabilitation; implant outcomes

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 8. 4. 2026 12:22, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

Objective: To clarify how fibula free flap (FFF) complications influence clinical and functional outcomes after implant-supported oral rehabilitation. Materials and methods: A single-center retrospective cohort of 29 patients (56.41 ± 12.74 years; 31% female, 69% male) who underwent segmental jaw resection, FFF reconstruction and subsequent implant placement (2002–2010) was analyzed. Demographic, oncologic, flap, implant-related and patient-centered functional variables were extracted; associations were tested with exact, rank and regression statistics (⍺ = 0.05). Result: Patients received 7.14 ± 3.06 implants each and 72% were restored with telescopic overdentures. Recipient-site wound-healing defects (WHD) occurred in 31% and were independently associated with multisegment osteotomies (p = 0.012) and longer operative time (p = 0.026); partial flap loss (PFL) was infrequent (6.9%). WHD reduced maximum inter-incisal opening (MIO) by 0.8 cm and PFL by 2.8 cm, both impairing contour ratings. Implant failure (0.59 ± 1.59) correlated with poorer speech intelligibility (p = 0.004) and lower aesthetic scores (p = 0.032). Nonetheless, 96% of patients spoke intelligibly (with or without concentration), 96% judged their dental aesthetic as good or excellent, and 75% consumed a normal diet. Ordinal regression confirmed the number of fibula segments as the sole predictor of contour (p = 0.001). Conclusions: FFF reconstruction permits dependable, implant-supported rehabilitation, but multisegment osteotomies and prolonged surgery heighten soft-tissue morbidity, which in turn constrains both MIO and appearance. Failed implants further degrade speech intelligibility and aesthetics. Long-term success therefore hinges on balancing the contour gains of complex osteotomies with flap vascular resilience while safeguarding implant stability.