J 2025

Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries - the European PERspective (SNIPER) survey

MORRONE, Doralisa; Giulio STEFANINI; De Carlo MARCO; Cristina GIANNINI; Gabor TOTH et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries - the European PERspective (SNIPER) survey

Autoři

MORRONE, Doralisa; Giulio STEFANINI; De Carlo MARCO; Cristina GIANNINI; Gabor TOTH; Dan PRUNEA; Carlo ZIVELONGHI; Alice BENEDETTI; De Bruyne BERNARD; Adriaan WILGENHOF; Jan KANOVSKY; Petr KALA; Lene HOLMVANG; Markus HASBAK; David HILDICK-SMITH; James COCKBURN; Nicolas AMABILE; Aurelie VEUGEOIS; Thomas HOVASSE; Antoinette NEYLON; Benjamin HONTON; Bruno FARAH; Tommaso GORI; Maike KNORR; Alexander WOLF; Thomas SCHMIT; Jorg HAUSLEITER; K. KONSTANTIN STARK; Mohamed ABDEL-WAHA; Hans-josef FEISTRITZER; Felix WOITEK; Axel LINKE; Jurgen LEICK; Shazia AFZAL; Dimitrios ALEXOPOULOS; Charalampos VARLAMOS; Kostantinos TSIOUFIS; Kyriakos DIMITRIADIS; Luca TESTA; Mattia SQUILLACE; Federico CONROTTO; Fabrizio D'ASCENZO; Gianluca CAMPO; Marta COCCO; Di Mario CARLO; Flavia CANIATO; Flavio Luciano RIBICHINI; Daniele PRATI; Giuseppe TARANTINI; Francesco CARDAIOLI; Francesco BURZOTTA; Lazzaro PARAGGIO; Francesco BEDOGNI; Luca ARZUFFI; Alaide CHIEFFO; Giulia GHIZZONI; Giedrius DAVIDAVICIUS; Povilas BUDRYS; Van Mieghem NICOLAS; Joost DAEMEN; Regine BRINKMANN; Hendrik BANTE; Maciej LESIAK; Sylwia IWANCZYK; Jerzy PREGOWSKI; Jaroslaw SKOWRONSKI; Sergio MADEIRA; Luis RAPOSO; Rodrigo ESTEVEZ-LOUREIRO; Antonio SISINNI; Javier ESCANED; Adrian JERONIMO; Raul MORENO; Santiago JIMENEZ-VALERO; Pieter VRIESENDORP; Tobias PUSTJENS; Van Geuns ROBERT; Peter DAMMAN; Van de Hoef TIM; Van der Harst PIM; Mamas A MAMAS; Simon DUCKETT; Ghada MIKHAIL; Carla LUCARELLI; Colin BERRY a De Caterina RAFFAELE

Vydání

Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2025, 1558-2027

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 2.000 v roce 2024

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

EID Scopus

Klíčová slova anglicky

intravascular ultrasound; magnetic resonance imaging; myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries; optical coherence tomography; vasoreactivity testing

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 16. 1. 2026 13:55, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

Background and aimsMyocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is a heterogeneous group of clinical entities requiring further investigation to assess prognosis and guide treatment. We evaluated current diagnostic practices across European academic centres in its diagnosis and management, to focus on current gaps in clinical practice.MethodsBetween June and October 2023, we distributed an electronic survey to 42 centres selected from a 2023 list of European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions Hosting Academic Centres, obtaining information on demographics of MINOCA, perceived clinical impact, testing and treatments.ResultsThe analysis was based on data from 41 centres. According to the survey, MINOCA accounts for approximately 10% of MI cases. Only 38% of the respondents perceived MINOCA as increasing the risk for future major adverse cardiovascular events. Sixty-three percent of centres agreed on the need for further testing after MINOCA diagnosis, and 22% reported proceeding with a comprehensive diagnostic algorithm. Intravascular (51%) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (50%) were the most common diagnostic tools used. Coronary plaque disruption was perceived as the most frequent cause based on respondents' opinions. Sixty-nine percent of centres considered 'empiric' therapy acceptable without functional testing.ConclusionsThis survey revealed a significant heterogeneity in the diagnostic approaches to MINOCA in academic European centres, with variable belief of its clinical impact, wide variation in diagnostic algorithms, noteworthy diagnostic inertia, and poor adherence to guideline recommendations. All these point to a pressing need for a unified approach to MINOCA testing and a much closer alignment to guidelines.