2025
Lumbar paraspinal muscles in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain and the effect of exercise: comparative and interventional study
KOKOŠOVÁ, Viktória; Daniela VLAŽNÁ; Peter KRKOŠKA; Michaela SLÁDEČKOVÁ; Marek DOSTÁL et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Lumbar paraspinal muscles in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain and the effect of exercise: comparative and interventional study
Autoři
KOKOŠOVÁ, Viktória; Daniela VLAŽNÁ; Peter KRKOŠKA; Michaela SLÁDEČKOVÁ; Marek DOSTÁL; Kateřina MATULOVÁ; Radim GERSTBERGER; Petra OVESNÁ ORCID a Blanka ADAMOVÁ
Vydání
FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES, LAUSANNE, FRONTIERS MEDIA SA, 2025, 2673-6861
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30210 Clinical neurology
Stát vydavatele
Švýcarsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 1.900 v roce 2024
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
magnetic resonance imaging; paraspinal muscles; muscle strength; endurance; low back pain; exercise therapy
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 19. 1. 2026 10:00, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Background Lumbar paraspinal muscles (LPM), which belong to lumbar extensor muscles, play a key role in stabilising the lumbar spine and maintaining spine health. Although chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) represents a major health problem worldwide, there is a knowledge gap regarding the function, morphology of LPM, and the effect of regular exercise on them in patients with CNLBP. The purpose of the study was to evaluate functional and quantitative MRI (qMRI) parameters of LPM in CNLBP patients, compare them to matched healthy volunteers (HV), and assess the effect of exercise therapy on these parameters in CNLBP patients. Methods The first part of the study was cross-sectional, observational, and comparative; the second was prospective and interventional. Based on physiological parameters, 43 matched pairs of CNLBP patients and HV were formed. All participants underwent MRI of the LPM using a 6-point Dixon gradient-echo sequence to assess qMRI parameters: fat fraction, total muscle volume, and functional muscle volume (FMV). Maximal isometric lumbar extensor muscle strength (MILEMS), lumbar extensor muscle endurance (LEME), MILEMS to LPM FMV ratio, pain, and disability were assessed. Each group's parameters were compared and effect size evaluated. The total of 29 patients entered an 18-week hybrid guided daily home-based exercise programme, which was completed by 27 CNLBP patients. The study was registered, trial registration number is ISRCTN11556477. Results CNLBP patients had significantly lower MILEMS, LEME (both P < 0.001), and MILEMS to LPM FMV ratio (P = 0.006) compared to matched HV. These parameters, as well as pain and disability, improved significantly after exercise (each P < 0.001). The qMRI parameters did not differ between CNLBP patients and HV, nor did they change after exercise therapy. Conclusions The significant LPM dysfunction and poorer muscle quality in CNLBP patients were reversible with exercise. Our study does not support the use of qMRI parameters as objective and reliable biomarkers of LPM dysfunction in a cohort of CNLBP with mild clinical impairment.
Návaznosti
| MUNI/A/1522/2024, interní kód MU |
|