2026
10 COVID-19 Restrictions in Long-Term Care Facilities in the United States: Unintended Consequences and Possible Lessons
HLÁVKA, Jakub; Yimin GE; Shengjia XU a Alexander M CAPRONZákladní údaje
Originální název
10 COVID-19 Restrictions in Long-Term Care Facilities in the United States: Unintended Consequences and Possible Lessons
Autoři
HLÁVKA, Jakub; Yimin GE; Shengjia XU a Alexander M CAPRON
Vydání
1. vyd. New York, Proportionality: A Guiding Principle in Public Health Law, Ethics, and Policy, od s. 155-183, 28 s. Oxford Scholarship Online, 2026
Nakladatel
Oxford University Press
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize
Obor
30304 Public and environmental health
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání
elektronická verze "online"
Odkazy
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ne
Organizační jednotka
Ekonomicko-správní fakulta
ISBN
978-0-19-775934-9
Klíčová slova anglicky
nursing home; visit restriction; public health; bioethics in nursing; end-of-life care; Alzheimers disease; infectious disease control
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 4. 2. 2026 15:33, Mgr. Alžběta Karolyiová
Anotace
V originále
The high rates of coronavirus infection and death among residents of long-term care (LTC) facilities in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States in 2020 led to strict public health limitations being imposed on visits by relatives and others from outside those facilities and on contacts among residents. This chapter describes and analyzes the risks involved and the role played by the restrictions along with other factors, such as changes in the virus and the availability of vaccines, in reducing harm to nursing home residents. To what extent were the benefits of such restrictions—which were imposed rapidly during the first, devastating surge of coronavirus infections in LTC facilities and later modified or rescinded to varying degrees—proportionate to the harms caused to residents’ well-being, and what considerations beyond physical and psychological harm should be included when weighing benefits and harms? For example, can and should decision-makers also consider the effects on residents’ self-agency imposed by such restrictions, and if so, how might those be incorporated into the policymaking calculus?