2026
Hallstatt Period Habrůvka ‒ “Býčí skála”. The Burial Constructions Reconsidered in the Light of Daub Analyses
HONS, David; Martin GOLEC; Zuzana GOLEC MÍROVÁ; Dalibor VŠIANSKÝ; Ivo SVĚTLÍK et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Hallstatt Period Habrůvka ‒ “Býčí skála”. The Burial Constructions Reconsidered in the Light of Daub Analyses
Autoři
HONS, David ORCID; Martin GOLEC; Zuzana GOLEC MÍROVÁ; Dalibor VŠIANSKÝ; Ivo SVĚTLÍK; Kateřina PACHNEROVÁ BRABCOVÁ a Radim KRATOCHVÍL
Vydání
Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica-Natural Sciences in Archaeology, UNIV HRADEC KRALOVE, 2026, 1804-848X
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
60102 Archaeology
Stát vydavatele
Česká republika
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 0.300 v roce 2024
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ne
Organizační jednotka
Filozofická fakulta
Klíčová slova anglicky
daub plaster Býčí skála Cave 6th century BC burial constructions/chambers old collection 1937‒1943 revision research 2020‒2021 optical petrographic analysis X-ray diffraction X-ray fluorescence 14C dating; daub; plaster; Býčí skála Cave; revision research; optical petrographic analysis; X-rax diffraction; X-ray fluorescence; 14C dating
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 29. 1. 2026 21:38, Mgr. David Hons, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
This article deals with the information value of daub from burial constructions from the 6th century BC obtained in the Entrance Hall of the Habrůvka – “Býčí skála” Cave in the years 2020–2021. The untypical discovery of daub, as a surface treatment of stone-wooden structures, allows for an innovative solution as to how the Hallstatt burial constructions/chambers were made. The set of daub samples was divided into two parts, giving two sets of daub samples. The first part represents an unpublished daub collection from 1937–1943. The second part consists of daub obtained from the, as yet, unpublished revision research from 2020–2021. Until now, it was unclear whether the two groups were related in time. The question is how was the daub preserved, was it by burning or natural drying. Based on XRD analysis, it can be assumed that the daub did not undergo high heat. XRF analysis showed a very similar source for the construction material in all probes. Radiocarbon dating of organic remains from the daub fragments made it possible to link these findings to the Hallstatt activities in the cave. A combination of analyses points to the Hallstatt burial structures.