2025
Fertility preservation practices and gastrointestinal oncologist in Europe: a pan-European study
BEN-AHARON, Irit; Tal GOSHEN-LAGO; Alberto PUCCINI; Maria ALSINA; Dirk ARNOLD et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Fertility preservation practices and gastrointestinal oncologist in Europe: a pan-European study
Autoři
BEN-AHARON, Irit; Tal GOSHEN-LAGO; Alberto PUCCINI; Maria ALSINA; Dirk ARNOLD; Van Laarhoven HANNEKE; Anneli ELME; Tineke BUFFART; Nina FOKTER-DOVNIK; Tomáš SOKOP ORCID; Radka LORDICK OBERMANNOVÁ; Florian LORDICK; Demetris PAPAMICHAEL; Francesco SCLAFANI; Elena ELEZ a Julien TAIEB
Vydání
Oncologist, OXFORD, OXFORD UNIV PRESS, 2025, 1083-7159
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30204 Oncology
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 4.200 v roce 2024
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
fertility preservation; gastrointestinal cancer; oncofertility; young adult cancer patients; European oncology practices
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 3. 3. 2026 10:18, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Introduction: The rising incidence of early-onset gastrointestinal (GI) cancer has made the impact of treatments on fertility of high significance. While there is abundant evidence on oncofertility outcomes in breast cancer and hematological malignancies, data regarding these perspectives in GI cancers is lacking. We sought to evaluate current practices of fertility preservation (FP) among GI oncologists across Europe. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was distributed through the Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Group (GITCG) of the EORTC network and affiliated cooperative groups and cancer centers using a 10-item electronic survey regarding oncofertility practices. The target population was oncologists who routinely treat GI cancers. A statistical analysis was performed based on country, patient volume, and tumor type. Results: Two hundred and twenty-six GI oncologists from 27 countries completed the survey, the majority from high volume cancer centers. Fifty seven percent of the participating oncologists routinely discuss the impact of treatment on fertility in any patient <40 years, while 36% discuss this only in the curative setting. Fifty-nine percent refer female patients to standard FP options (embryo/oocyte preservation), while 24% chose to refer to ovarian cryopreservation. Of note, 17% indicated they would not refer a curative patient for FP at all due to time or resource issues. Sixty five percent routinely refer male patients to sperm preservation. Use of Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone analogues (GnRHa) in CRC patients is recommended by 34% of oncologists. In the setting of pelvic radiation, 65% refer a female patient for ovarian transposition before pelvic irradiation; 32% would consider uterine transposition. Sixty one percent would consider a nonradiation protocol as perioperative chemotherapy as a valid option for young female patients. We observed heterogeneity upon country but not upon physician gender. Conclusion: Our study indicates a substantial diversity in current practices in Europe with regard to FP in young cancer patients with GI malignancies, which is not always aligned with current guidelines. There is a need to disseminate and educate GI oncologists on oncofertility perspectives and contemporary data. Additionally, there is a need to establish evidence on the utility of fertility preservation options for patients with GI cancers.