2026
The fraud pentagon theory and Machiavellianism: experimental study of direct and moderating effects
ČÁSTEK, Ondřej a Seto SATRIYO BAYU AJIZákladní údaje
Originální název
The fraud pentagon theory and Machiavellianism: experimental study of direct and moderating effects
Autoři
ČÁSTEK, Ondřej ORCID a Seto SATRIYO BAYU AJI
Vydání
International Journal of Ethics and Systems, EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD, 2026, 2514-9369
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
50200 5.2 Economics and Business
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 3.200 v roce 2024
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ne
Organizační jednotka
Ekonomicko-správní fakulta
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
Fraud pentagon theory; Machiavellianism; Corporate fraud; CSR; Pressure; Opportunity; Rationalisation; Internal controls; Personality traits
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 1. 4. 2026 11:00, Mgr. Alžběta Karolyiová
Anotace
V originále
Purpose This study aims to examine the predictive power of the fraud pentagon theory (FPT) and Machiavellianism while explaining the likelihood of committing fraud in corporate social responsibility (CSR) fund distribution framing. The research addresses a significant gap in the literature concerning the complex nature of explanatory variables in the field of corporate fraud on the individual level. Design/methodology/approach A laboratory experiment (n = 287) with a 2 x 2 factorial design was conducted in two countries, manipulating pressure and opportunity while assessing rationalisation, capability, arrogance and Machiavellianism via questionnaire. Multiple linear regression and moderation analyses were used to test direct and interaction effects on fraud, operationalised as money retained by participants. Findings Pressure, opportunity and rationalisation significantly increased the likelihood of fraud. Capability and arrogance showed weaker or inconsistent direct effects. Machiavellianism did not directly predict fraud but significantly moderated the effects of pressure, rationalisation and capability. Research limitations/implications Further research should replicate findings in professional settings and refine the measurement of capability. Practical implications Findings underscore the importance of tailored internal controls and ethical training that account for both situational pressures and individual personality traits. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is among the first empirical studies to test the full FPT model in a CSR context using experimental methodology. It introduces Machiavellianism as a moderator of fraud-related behaviours, extending the explanatory power and offering a nuanced understanding of how personality traits interact with situational variables.