2025
Lenalidomide based triplets in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: analysis of the Czech Myeloma Group
MINARIK, Jiri; Luděk POUR; Vojtech LATAL; Tomas JELINEK; Jan STRAUB et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Lenalidomide based triplets in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: analysis of the Czech Myeloma Group
Autoři
MINARIK, Jiri; Luděk POUR; Vojtech LATAL; Tomas JELINEK; Jan STRAUB; Alexandra JUNGOVA; Jakub RADOCHA; Petr PAVLICEK; Martin ŠTORK; Tomas PIKA; Petra KRHOVSKA; Tereza POPKOVA; Frantisek SEDLAK; Ivan SPICKA; Pavel JINDRA; Vladimira CAPOUNOVA; Vladimir MAISNAR a Roman HAJEK
Vydání
BMC Cancer, London, BioMed Central, 2025, 1471-2407
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30205 Hematology
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 3.400 v roce 2024
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/25:00143775
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
Multiple myeloma; Relapsed/refractory; Lenalidomide triplets; Risk groups
Příznaky
Recenzováno
Změněno: 24. 2. 2026 12:39, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Despite significant advancements in therapy of multiple myeloma (MM) over the past 20 years, most patients experience relapse, necessitating new treatment approaches. This study aims to compare the real-world effectiveness of lenalidomide (LEN)-based triplet therapies, specifically daratumumab (DRD), carfilzomib (KRD), and ixazomib (IRD), in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).A retrospective registry-based study analyzed 538 RRMM patients undergoing therapy for their first to third relapse. The primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), with a matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAIC) employed to address cohort differences.ORR was highest for DRD at 91.4%, followed by KRD (89.6%) and IRD cohorts (Early-IRD: 79.6%, Late-IRD: 70.8%). Median PFS for DRD was greater at 23.64 months compared to KRD (16.52 months) and IRD groups (Early-IRD: 19.97 months, Late-IRD: 11.57 months). The MAIC confirmed better outcomes for the DRD regimen. High-risk features were not overcome by any of the LEN-based regimens.The findings underscore the superior efficacy of DRD in achieving sustained responses in RRMM patients. The composition of the cohort is a crucial factor, extending beyond selection criteria. This study highlights the importance of real-world evidence in assessing treatment modalities in clinical settings.
Návaznosti
| EH22_008/0004644, projekt VaV |
|