2025
The ENHANCE-3 study: venetoclax and azacitidine plus magrolimab or placebo for untreated AML unfit for intensive therapy
DAVER, Naval; Paresh VYAS; Gerwin HULS; Hartmut DOHNER; Sebastien MAURY et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
The ENHANCE-3 study: venetoclax and azacitidine plus magrolimab or placebo for untreated AML unfit for intensive therapy
Autoři
DAVER, Naval; Paresh VYAS; Gerwin HULS; Hartmut DOHNER; Sebastien MAURY; Jan NOVAK; Cristina PAPAYANNIDIS; Carmen Martinez CHAMORRO; Pau MONTESINOS; Rabin NIROULA; Pierre FENAUX; Jordi ESTEVE; Shang-Ju WU; De Voeght ADRIEN; Jiří MAYER; Peter J M VALK; Lisa JOHNSON; Mei DONG; Liu KE; Sowmya KUWAHARA; Kenneth CALDWELL a Guru Subramanian Guru MURTHY
Vydání
Blood, AMSTERDAM, ELSEVIER, 2025, 0006-4971
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30205 Hematology
Stát vydavatele
Nizozemské království
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 23.100 v roce 2024
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/25:00143874
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
The ENHANCE-3 study; venetoclax; azacitidine; magrolimab; placebo; untreated AML; unfit for intensive therapy
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 5. 3. 2026 09:08, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy (IC) have limited treatment options. The phase 3 ENHANCE-3 study aimed to determine whether magrolimab (magrolimab arm) was superior to placebo (control arm) when either was combined with venetoclax and azacitidine. Adults with previously untreated AML who were ineligible for IC were randomized to receive magrolimab (1 mg/kg on days 1 and 4, 15 mg/kg on day 8, 30 mg/kg on days 11 and 15, then weekly for 5 weeks, and then every 2 weeks) or placebo, venetoclax (100 mg on day 1, 200 mg on day 2, and 400 mg daily thereafter), and azacitidine (75 mg/m2 days 1-7) in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was overall survival (OS); key secondary end points included complete remission (CR) rate and safety. After randomization of 378 patients, the trial was stopped at a prespecified interim analysis owing to futility. At fi final analysis, with median follow-up of 7.6 months (magrolimab arm) vs 7.4 months (control arm), median OS was 10.7 vs 14.1 months (hazard ratio, 1.178; 95% confidence interval, 0.848-1.637). The CR rate within 6 cycles was 41.3% vs 46.0%. Addition of magrolimab to venetoclax and azacitidine resulted in more fatal adverse events (19.0% vs 11.4%), primarily driven by grade 5 infections (11.1% vs 6.5%) and respiratory events (2.6% vs 0%). There were similar incidences of any-grade infections, febrile neutropenia, and neutropenia between arms. These results highlight the difficulty in improving outcomes for patients with AML who were ineligible for IC. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT05079230.