Doklad ili razkaz? Kachestveno izsledvane na cenzurata v socialnite nauki v Chehiia, 1968-1989 godina.

OATES-INDRUCHOVÁ, Libora. Doklad ili razkaz? Kachestveno izsledvane na cenzurata v socialnite nauki v Chehiia, 1968-1989 godina. Sociological Problems/Sociologicheski Problemi, Sociology and Interdisciplinary Knowledge. Sofia: Institute of Sociology Bulgarian Academy, 2007, roč. 2007, 1-2, s. 288-301. ISSN 0324-1572.

Základní údaje

• Originální název: Doklad ili razkaz? Kachestveno izsledvane na cenzurata v socialnite nauki v Chehiia, 1968-1989 godina.
• Název česky: Zpráva z výzkumu nebo vyprávění? Kvalitativní výzkum cenzury v českých společenských vědách, 1968-89.
• Název anglicky: Reporting or Story-telling?: Qualitative Research on Censorship in Czech Social Sciences, 1968-89.
• Autoři: OATES-INDRUCHOVÁ, Libora (203 Česká republika, garant).
• Vydání: Sociological Problems/Sociologicheski Problemi, Sociology and Interdisciplinary Knowledge, Sofia, Institute of Sociology Bulgarian Academy, 2007, 0324-1572.

Další údaje

• Originální jazyk: bulharština
• Typ výsledku: Článek v odborném periodiku
• Obor: 50000 5. Social Sciences
• Stát vydavatele: Bulharsko
• Utajení: není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
• Kód RIV: RIV/00216224:14230/07:00020708
• Organizační jednotka: Fakulta sociálních studií
• Klíčová slova anglicky: narrative research; interdisciplinarity; narratology; writing modes
• Štítky: interdisciplinarity, narrative research, narratology, writing modes
• Příznaky: Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Anotace

If literary theory helps us to interpret imaginative texts, it should also enable us to construct texts that look like they are imaginative, but everything in them is based in (social) research. The article draws on research into academic publishing under authoritarian conditions: it began as research into language and ended as research into social and personal dynamics of text production. During the research a problem occured with writing up the research findings: academic mode of writing captured only a part of the story. A solution is presented: bringing together analytical methods of qualitative research and imaginative methods of textual presentation. The resulting text reinstates story as a writing mode for research reporting, while this practice additionally draws attention to the research process.

Anotace česky

If literary theory helps us to interpret imaginative texts, it should also enable us to construct texts that look like they are imaginative, but everything in them is based in (social) research. The article draws on research into academic publishing under authoritarian conditions: it began as research into language and ended as research into social and personal dynamics of text production. During the research a problem occured with writing up the research findings: academic mode of writing captured only a part of the story. A solution is presented: bringing together analytical methods of qualitative research and imaginative methods of textual presentation. The resulting text reinstates story as a writing mode for research reporting, while this practice additionally draws attention to the research process.

Anotace anglicky

If literary theory helps us to interpret imaginative texts, it should also enable us to construct texts that look like they are imaginative, but everything in them is based in (social) research. The article draws on research into academic publishing under authoritarian conditions: it began as research into language and ended as research into social and personal dynamics of text production. During the research a problem occured with writing up the research findings: academic mode of writing captured only a part of the story. A solution is presented: bringing together analytical methods of qualitative research and imaginative methods of textual presentation. The resulting text reinstates story as a writing mode for research reporting, while this practice additionally draws attention to the research process.

Návaznosti

• GA405/03/1056, projekt VaV: Název: Autocenzura a ´kódování ´ vědeckých textů v období normalizace, 1968-1989