2009
Tourmalinites in the metamorphic complex of the Svratka Unit (Bohemian Massif): a study of compositional growth of tourmaline and genetic relations
ČOPJAKOVÁ, Renata; David BURIÁNEK; Radek ŠKODA a Stanislav HOUZARZákladní údaje
Originální název
Tourmalinites in the metamorphic complex of the Svratka Unit (Bohemian Massif): a study of compositional growth of tourmaline and genetic relations
Název česky
Tourmalinites in the metamorphic complex of the Svratka Unit (Bohemian Massif): a study of compositional growth of tourmaline and genetic relations
Autoři
Vydání
Journal of Geosciences, Praha, Česká geologická společnost, 2009, 1802-6222
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
10500 1.5. Earth and related environmental sciences
Stát vydavatele
Česká republika
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14310/09:00036911
Organizační jednotka
Přírodovědecká fakulta
UT WoS
Klíčová slova anglicky
tourmalinite; mica schist; schorl; dravite; metamorphism; B- F-rich fluids; Svratka Unit; Czech Republic
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 20. 10. 2009 16:29, doc. Mgr. Radek Škoda, Ph.D.
V originále
Tourmalinites from the Svratka Unit form stratiform layers hosted in mica schists. The chemical composition of tourmaline from tourmalinites varies from Al-rich schorl to dravite. The tourmaline usually exhibits three compositional domains, which are, from centre to the rim: a chemically inhomogeneous brecciated core (zone I), a volumetrically minor internal rim zone II, and a dominant outermost zone III. The compositional variability of tourmaline in all the zones is controlled by the (X YAl WOH) (XNa Y Mg WF)-1 and YFeYMg-1 substitutions. The tourmaline of the zone I corresponds to highly vacanced X-site, Al-rich schorl with lower F (up to 0.43 apfu), which is interpreted as an older, low-temperature hydrothermal tourmaline. Tourmaline of the zone II corresponds to dravite rich in F (reaching up to 0.66 apfu) crystallizing during the prograde metamorphism. Lastly, the Al-rich schorl-dravite of the zone III, grew most likely during retrograde metamorphism. The tourmaline from the host mica schists has a similar chemical composition. The central dravite part corresponds to the zone II, and the predominant schorl-dravite rim to the zone III, in tourmalines from tourmalinites. Overall, the dravite exhibits compositional characteristics of the prograde, amphibolite-facies metamorphic event characterised by the mineral assemblage Qtz + Ms + Bt + Tu +/- Ky +/- St +/- Grt. The second generation of tourmaline (schorl-dravite), as well as the rim of garnets present in both the mica-schists and tourmalinites, formed during exhumation of the Svratka Unit accompanied by decreasing pressure and temperature. In the mica schists, this event resulted in decompression breakdown of staurolite, according to the reaction St + Ms + Qtz = Grt + Sil + Bt + H2O. Breakdown of muscovite could have released B and F used for tourmaline formation. The P-T conditions of this retrograde metamorphism were calculated at 600-640 oC and 5-6 kbar. Tourmalinites are interpreted as a part of a metamorphosed volcano-sedimentary complex primarily rich in F and B, however, the derivation of all the F- and B-rich fluids from the neighbouring migmatites and metagranites is unlikely. Similarities in the chemical composition of the tourmalinites and the mica schists suggest a similar protolith to both rock types. The variation in most of the elements reflects the mineral composition associated with the transition from mica schist to tourmalinite.
Česky
Tourmalinites from the Svratka Unit form stratiform layers hosted in mica schists. The chemical composition of tourmaline from tourmalinites varies from Al-rich schorl to dravite. The tourmaline usually exhibits three compositional domains, which are, from centre to the rim: a chemically inhomogeneous brecciated core (zone I), a volumetrically minor internal rim zone II, and a dominant outermost zone III. The compositional variability of tourmaline in all the zones is controlled by the (X YAl WOH) (XNa Y Mg WF)-1 and YFeYMg-1 substitutions. The tourmaline of the zone I corresponds to highly vacanced X-site, Al-rich schorl with lower F (up to 0.43 apfu), which is interpreted as an older, low-temperature hydrothermal tourmaline. Tourmaline of the zone II corresponds to dravite rich in F (reaching up to 0.66 apfu) crystallizing during the prograde metamorphism. Lastly, the Al-rich schorl-dravite of the zone III, grew most likely during retrograde metamorphism. The tourmaline from the host mica schists has a similar chemical composition. The central dravite part corresponds to the zone II, and the predominant schorl-dravite rim to the zone III, in tourmalines from tourmalinites. Overall, the dravite exhibits compositional characteristics of the prograde, amphibolite-facies metamorphic event characterised by the mineral assemblage Qtz + Ms + Bt + Tu +/- Ky +/- St +/- Grt. The second generation of tourmaline (schorl-dravite), as well as the rim of garnets present in both the mica-schists and tourmalinites, formed during exhumation of the Svratka Unit accompanied by decreasing pressure and temperature. In the mica schists, this event resulted in decompression breakdown of staurolite, according to the reaction St + Ms + Qtz = Grt + Sil + Bt + H2O. Breakdown of muscovite could have released B and F used for tourmaline formation. The P-T conditions of this retrograde metamorphism were calculated at 600-640 oC and 5-6 kbar. Tourmalinites are interpreted as a part of a metamorphosed volcano-sedimentary complex primarily rich in F and B, however, the derivation of all the F- and B-rich fluids from the neighbouring migmatites and metagranites is unlikely. Similarities in the chemical composition of the tourmalinites and the mica schists suggest a similar protolith to both rock types. The variation in most of the elements reflects the mineral composition associated with the transition from mica schist to tourmalinite.