An ideal method of inguinal hernia repair – a never-ending
story

a 2005

An ideal method of inguinal hernia repair – a never-ending story

NOVOTNÝ, Tomáš; Miroslav KREJČÍ; Jindřich LEYPOLD; Jiří JEŘÁBEK; Jan BUČEK et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

An ideal method of inguinal hernia repair – a never-ending story

Název česky

Ideální plastika tříselné kýly - nekonečný příběh

Název anglicky

An ideal method of inguinal hernia repair – a never-ending story

Autoři

NOVOTNÝ, Tomáš; Miroslav KREJČÍ; Jindřich LEYPOLD; Jiří JEŘÁBEK a Jan BUČEK

Vydání

Konference mladých lékařů 2005, 2005

Další údaje

Typ výsledku

Konferenční abstrakt

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

ISSN

Klíčová slova česky

tříselná kýla - chirurgická síťka - hernioplastika

Klíčová slova anglicky

inguinal hernia - surgical mesh - hernia repair

Změněno: 10. 11. 2010 20:09, MUDr. Tomáš Novotný, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

Hernia is a very common disorder. Its incidence ranges from 3 to 5 % of the population in different countries. Inguinal hernia represents 75 % of all hernias. The only therapeutic option is surgical repair, which is one of the most frequent operations performed in general surgery. Today there are 3 groups of surgical procedures: conventional (Shouldice), open tension-free (Lichtenstein), and laparoscopic tension-free (TAPP). These groups were compared using meta-analyses of 61 randomised trials to find out which group is the best for inguinal hernia repair. The methods of anaesthesia (local, regional, general) for open inguinal hernia repair were also compared using the results of two randomised trials. All methods of hernia repair have disadvantages and complications. Meta-analyses confirm that open tension-free methods are the best option today. There are no differences between mesh (tensionfree) and non-mesh (conventional) open repair groups in complications including infections, and it is confirmed that the use of mesh is associated with a substantial reduction in the risk of recurrence. The laparoscopic approach has yet to await further analysis. A comparison of the forms of open inguinal hernia repair anaesthesia confirms considerable advantages of local anaesthesia over regional or general anaesthesias. We can conclude that an ideal method of inguinal hernia repair does not exist. Much work remains ahead of us to develop it. The best methods that we have today are open tension-free techniques. We can also expect a renaissance of local anaesthesia for open inguinal hernia repair.

Citovat

NOVOTNÝ, Tomáš; Miroslav KREJČÍ; Jindřich LEYPOLD; Jiří JEŘÁBEK a Jan BUČEK. An ideal method of inguinal hernia repair – a never-ending story. In Konference mladých lékařů 2005. 2005. ISSN 1211-3395.

@proceedings{906769,
   author = {Novotný, Tomáš and Krejčí, Miroslav and Leypold, Jindřich and Jeřábek, Jiří and Buček, Jan},
   booktitle = {Konference mladých lékařů 2005},
   keywords = {inguinal hernia - surgical mesh - hernia repair},
   title = {An ideal method of inguinal hernia repair – a never-ending story},
   year = {2005}
}

TY  - CONF
ID  - 906769
AU  - Novotný, Tomáš - Krejčí, Miroslav - Leypold, Jindřich - Jeřábek, Jiří - Buček, Jan
PY  - 2005
TI  - An ideal method of inguinal hernia repair – a never-ending story
KW  - inguinal hernia - surgical mesh - hernia repair
N2  - Hernia is a very common disorder. Its incidence ranges from 3 to 5 % of the population in different countries. Inguinal hernia represents 75 % of all hernias. The only therapeutic option is surgical repair, which is one of the most frequent operations performed in general surgery. Today there are 3 groups of surgical procedures: conventional (Shouldice), open tension-free (Lichtenstein), and laparoscopic tension-free (TAPP). These groups were compared using meta-analyses of 61 randomised trials to find out which group is the best for inguinal hernia repair. The methods of anaesthesia (local, regional, general) for open inguinal hernia repair were also compared using the results of two randomised trials. All methods of hernia repair have disadvantages and complications. Meta-analyses confirm that open tension-free methods are the best option today. There are no differences between mesh (tensionfree) and non-mesh (conventional) open repair groups in complications including infections, and it is confirmed that the use of mesh is associated with a substantial reduction in the risk of recurrence. The laparoscopic approach has yet to await further analysis. A comparison of the forms of open inguinal hernia repair anaesthesia confirms considerable advantages of local anaesthesia over regional or general anaesthesias. We can conclude that an ideal method of inguinal hernia repair does not exist. Much work remains ahead of us to develop it. The best methods that we have today are open tension-free techniques. We can also expect a renaissance of local anaesthesia for open inguinal hernia repair.
ER  -

NOVOTNÝ, Tomáš; Miroslav KREJČÍ; Jindřich LEYPOLD; Jiří JEŘÁBEK a Jan BUČEK. An ideal method of inguinal hernia repair – a never-ending story. In \textit{Konference mladých lékařů 2005}. 2005. ISSN~1211-3395.

Přehled o publikaci