ŠKOP, Martin, Michal ARASZKIEWICZ, Matěj MYŠKA, Terezie SMEJKALOVÁ and Jaromír ŠAVELKA. Argumentation 2011. Brno: MUNI Press, 2011. ISBN 978-80-210-5579-7.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Argumentation 2011
Authors ŠKOP, Martin (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Michal ARASZKIEWICZ (616 Poland), Matěj MYŠKA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Terezie SMEJKALOVÁ (203 Czech Republic) and Jaromír ŠAVELKA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution).
Edition Brno, 2011.
Publisher MUNI Press
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Editing of thematic compilation, editing of monothematic issue of professional journal
Field of Study 50500 5.5 Law
Country of publisher Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14220/11:00053409
Organization unit Faculty of Law
ISBN 978-80-210-5579-7
Keywords in English alternative methods; argumentation; law and language; law and literature; visualization of law; formal methods; legal reasoning
Tags Munipress, rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: doc. JUDr. Mgr. Martin Škop, Ph.D., učo 11158. Changed: 6/2/2012 10:19.
Abstract
Argumentation, reasoning and justification have always been inherent parts of lawyers’ work. Lawyers themselves are obviously well aware of the fact and would almost unanimously acknowledge that enhancing one’s knowledge and skills in argumentation has a direct impact on the quality of their work. The theoretical approach to the argumentation is usually concerned with the study of the nature and structure of arguments, development of models and frameworks of argumentation and assessment of ways to strengthen or attack arguments. The ambition of the conference is to establish a permanent platform to discuss and explore the alternative methods of legal argumentation, i.e. those that are not regularly employed in everyday legal practice, but would prove extremely valuable if adopted. It is thus our intention to bring new stimuli to both the approaches to the argumentation by showing that the outcomes of both are valuable and can be combined in coherent theories. The conference consists of four workshops/streams each specialized in a specific and unique method of studying legal argumentation: Formal Methods in Legal Reasoning Law and Literature Law and Language Visualization of Law.
PrintDisplayed: 31/5/2024 01:34