| BĚLOHRAD, Radim. The Is-Ought Problem, the Open Question Argument, and the New Science of Morality. Human Affairs, A postdisciplinary Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences. Bratislava: Slovak Academy of Sciences, 2011, roč. 21, č. 3, s. 262-271, 9 s. ISSN 1210-3055. |
Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{961415,
author = {Bělohrad, Radim},
article_location = {Bratislava},
article_number = {č. 3},
keywords = {is-ought; open question argument; Harris; science; a priori},
language = {eng},
issn = {1210-3055},
journal = {Human Affairs, A postdisciplinary Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences},
title = {The Is-Ought Problem, the Open Question Argument, and the New Science of Morality},
url = {http://www.humanaffairs.sk/index.php?id=ha311},
volume = {roč. 21},
year = {2011}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 961415
AU - Bělohrad, Radim
PY - 2011
TI - The Is-Ought Problem, the Open Question Argument, and the New Science of Morality
JF - Human Affairs, A postdisciplinary Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences
VL - roč. 21
IS - č. 3
SP - 262-271
EP - 262-271
PB - Slovak Academy of Sciences
SN - 12103055
KW - is-ought
KW - open question argument
KW - Harris
KW - science
KW - a priori
UR - http://www.humanaffairs.sk/index.php?id=ha311
N2 - The article deals with a recent attack by Sam Harris on two famous arguments that purport to establish a gap between factual and evaluative statements: Hume’s Is/Ought Problem and Moore’s Open Question Argument. I present the arguments, analyze the relationship between them and critically assess Harris’ attempt to refute them. I conclude that Harris’ attempt fails.
ER -
BĚLOHRAD, Radim. The Is-Ought Problem, the Open Question Argument, and the New Science of Morality. \textit{Human Affairs, A postdisciplinary Journal of Humanities \&{} Social Sciences}. Bratislava: Slovak Academy of Sciences, 2011, roč. 21, č. 3, s.~262-271, 9 s. ISSN~1210-3055.
|
