A valid list of recognised psychotherapies

k 2009

A valid list of recognised psychotherapies

VYBÍRAL, Zbyněk a Ester DANELOVÁ

Základní údaje

Originální název

A valid list of recognised psychotherapies

Autoři

VYBÍRAL, Zbyněk a Ester DANELOVÁ

Vydání

Canadian regional meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research (CA-SPR) in Montreal, Canada. October, 24-25. 2009

Další údaje

Typ výsledku

Prezentace na konferencích

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Organizační jednotka

Fakulta sociálních studií

Klíčová slova anglicky

criteria list modality treatment scientific

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam

Změněno: 3. 4. 2012 20:29, PhDr. Ester Danelová

Anotace

V originále

In our paper we present the results of an attempt to generate a widely recognised list of psychotherapy modalities, based on criteria interconnecting recent research outcomes, practise-based evidence, relevant scientific literature, and guidelines of influential institutions in the field. Attention has been given to several similar endeavours. We present examples of non-valid lists of treatments in the field and mention various estimations of the sum of recognised psychotherapy approaches in both, scientific and lay resources. Our study attempts to offer a systematic and scientific alternative to these, as a platform for further discussion. Practice implication of our empirical study lies in providing practitioners with a science-based view on which treatments are widely recognised, and which are not – and why, emphasizing the transparency of our criteria. Some of the criteria on the basis of which varied treatment modalities have been included are as follows: (1) The treatment has been recognized by the European Association for Psychotherapy and/or influential bodies in significant EU countries like the UK; (2) The treatment is included in the list of Empirically Supported Treatments; (3) The approach has been mentioned in several influential publications in the field; (4) Articles focusing on the approach have been published in scientific journals, e.g. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training and others, taking into account approximately 1000 journal abstracts. In the paper we present both, a summary of the discussion focused on the establishment of the criteria, and the outcome of our study: The list of recognised psychotherapies based on the criteria.

Citovat

VYBÍRAL, Zbyněk a Ester DANELOVÁ. A valid list of recognised psychotherapies. In Canadian regional meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research (CA-SPR) in Montreal, Canada. October, 24-25. 2009.

@proceedings{978413,
   author = {Vybíral, Zbyněk and Danelová, Ester},
   booktitle = {Canadian regional meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research (CA-SPR) in Montreal, Canada. October, 24-25.},
   keywords = {criteria list modality treatment scientific},
   title = {A valid list of recognised psychotherapies},
   year = {2009}
}

TY  - CONF
ID  - 978413
AU  - Vybíral, Zbyněk - Danelová, Ester
PY  - 2009
TI  - A valid list of recognised psychotherapies
KW  - criteria list modality treatment scientific
N2  - In our paper we present the results of an attempt to generate a widely recognised list of psychotherapy modalities, based on criteria interconnecting recent research outcomes, practise-based evidence, relevant scientific literature, and guidelines of influential institutions in the field. Attention has been given to several similar endeavours. We present examples of non-valid lists of treatments in the field and mention various estimations of the sum of recognised psychotherapy approaches in both, scientific and lay resources. Our study attempts to offer a systematic and scientific alternative to these, as a platform for further discussion. Practice implication of our empirical study lies in providing practitioners with a science-based view on which treatments are widely recognised, and which are not – and why, emphasizing the transparency of our criteria. Some of the criteria on the basis of which varied treatment modalities have been included are as follows: (1) The treatment has been recognized by the European Association for Psychotherapy and/or influential bodies in significant EU countries like the UK; (2) The treatment is included in the list of Empirically Supported Treatments; (3) The approach has been mentioned in several influential publications in the field; (4) Articles focusing on the approach have been published in scientific journals, e.g. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training and others, taking into account approximately 1000 journal abstracts. In the paper we present both, a summary of the discussion focused on the establishment of the criteria, and the outcome of our study: The list of recognised psychotherapies based on the criteria.
ER  -

VYBÍRAL, Zbyněk a Ester DANELOVÁ. A valid list of recognised psychotherapies. In \textit{Canadian regional meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research (CA-SPR) in Montreal, Canada. October, 24-25.}. 2009.

Přehled o publikaci