2011
Comparison of the Resting Metabolic Rate in Athlete and Non-athlete Population
BERNACIKOVÁ, Martina a Eva SEDLÁČKOVÁZákladní údaje
Originální název
Comparison of the Resting Metabolic Rate in Athlete and Non-athlete Population
Autoři
BERNACIKOVÁ, Martina a Eva SEDLÁČKOVÁ
Vydání
Sport and quality of life 2011, 2011
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Konferenční abstrakt
Obor
Sport a aktivity volného času
Stát vydavatele
Česká republika
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14510/11:00056775
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta sportovních studií
ISBN
978-80-210-5610-7
Klíčová slova anglicky
metabolism; resting metabolic rate; athlete population; nonathlete population; Cortex Metalyzer 3B; indirect calorimetry
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 13. 4. 2012 10:36, Mgr. Eva Špillingová
Anotace
V originále
Purpose Measurement of basal and resting metabolic rate (BMR and RMR) seems appropriate to detect complement a healthy lifestyle. Higher energy expenditure at rest helps with weight loss in people with overweight and obesity. The aim of this contribution is to compare values of resting metabolic rate of athlete and non-athlete population. Methods Eighteen women (19-26 years old) were examined by Metalyzer 3B (Cortex) device. We have two groups: 9 women (64 kg, 170cm) in athlete population (with regular physical activity three or more hours per week) and 9 women (61 kg, 168cm) non-athlete population (with physical activity up to 1 hour per week). This measurement took place at our laboratory at the Faculty of Sports Studies at the Masaryk University. Results We didn`t prove statistically significant difference between outcomes of the resting metabolic rate of athlete population, where the average value came up to about 7958 kJ/d (with predicted 6780 kJ/d ) and the sample of non-athlete population with average values about 7128 kJ/d d (with predicted 6666 kJ/d ). Average heart rate during measuring was 64 beats per minute in athlete and 68 beats per minute in non-athlete. Conclusions Also our hypothesis was not confirmed statistically, but we think the real significance is established. In the future, we recommend a similar measurement on large sample of people.