KUNDT, Radek. Social Darwinism and the emergence of scientific study of religion : ends and beginnings of theory in religious studies. In Ends and Beginnings : Annual Conference of the EASR 2012, Stockholm, 23-26 August 2012. 2012.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Social Darwinism and the emergence of scientific study of religion : ends and beginnings of theory in religious studies
Autoři KUNDT, Radek (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí).
Vydání Ends and Beginnings : Annual Conference of the EASR 2012, Stockholm, 23-26 August 2012, 2012.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Prezentace na konferencích
Obor 60300 6.3 Philosophy, Ethics and Religion
Stát vydavatele Švédsko
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14210/12:00060746
Organizační jednotka Filozofická fakulta
Klíčová slova anglicky social Darwinism; scientific study of religion; cognitive science of religion; cultural evolution
Štítky rivok
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil Změnil: Mgr. et Mgr. Radek Kundt, Ph.D., učo 42130. Změněno: 21. 11. 2016 10:43.
Anotace
Using evolutionary theory to explain cultural phenomena is once again strongly contested. Cognitive Science of Religion maintains that cross-cultural recurrences of religious phenomena might be explained through constraints of cognitive mechanisms of human mind acquired in the process of natural selection. In this fashion the question of origins of religion is being asked and answered again. I will address the differences between contemporary evolutionary perspectives and the evolutionary approaches used in nineteenth century study of religion. Through critical analysis of its premises and lines of argumentation I will also map different usages of today’s evolutionary theory, to what phenomena and to what end they are being applied. Focusing on both adaptive and non-adaptive theories I will show that problems arise from inconsistencies to what is evolutionary theory applied to as well as from not having a clear line drawn between what is still scientific and what is already philosophical/theological overstepping. In the end I will argue that in spite of these oversteps it is indeed valid and promising approach. It is a part of bigger theoretical shift within Religious studies usually accompanied by refreshingly clearly stated philosophy of science that calls for new reductionism, explanatory theories, naturalistic multidisciplinary approach and consilience of science and humanities, thus being a revival of Theory of religion-as-such similar to those essential for the rise our discipline, rather than close and detailed studies in a limited areas that shaped Religious Studies since mid-twentieth century.
Návaznosti
EE2.3.20.0048, projekt VaVNázev: Laboratoř pro experimentální výzkum náboženství
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 19. 4. 2024 18:47