Inclusion before Exclusion or Vice Versa: What the
Qualification Directive and the Court of Justice Do (Not) Say

J 2013

Inclusion before Exclusion or Vice Versa: What the Qualification Directive and the Court of Justice Do (Not) Say

KOSAŘ, David

Základní údaje

Originální název

Inclusion before Exclusion or Vice Versa: What the Qualification Directive and the Court of Justice Do (Not) Say

Autoři

KOSAŘ, David (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)

Vydání

International journal of refugee law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, 0953-8186

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50500 5.5 Law

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14220/13:00067478

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eet004

UT WoS

000210929300004

Klíčová slova anglicky

Geneva Convention relating to the Status of Refugees; exclusion clause; inclusion clause; Qualification Directive; Procedures Directive; Court of Justice

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 10. 12. 2013 15:41, prof. JUDr. David Kosař, Ph.D., LL.M., J. S. D.

Anotace

V originále

The question whether the assessment of the inclusion clause must precede the application of the exclusion clauses under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (CSR51) is a recurring theme in many jurisdictions. This article shows that the jurisprudence of the top national courts shifted decisively in favour of the ‘exclusion before inclusion’ position. Subsequently, this article looks for guidance at the Qualification and Procedures Directives. It claims that although it is generally assumed that the European Asylum Acquis left this issue untouched, it endorses the ‘exclusion before inclusion’ position and it does so even more overtly than the CSR51. However, this article also puts forth the argument that the Qualification Directive taken in conjunction with the Procedures Directive creates an obligation for the EU Member States that goes beyond the CSR51, namely to address inclusion in the interview with the applicant even in cases when the refugee adjudicators plan to apply the exclusion clause.

Citovat

KOSAŘ, David. Inclusion before Exclusion or Vice Versa: What the Qualification Directive and the Court of Justice Do (Not) Say. International journal of refugee law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, roč. 25, č. 1, s. 87-119. ISSN 0953-8186. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eet004.

@article{992804,
   author = {Kosař, David},
   article_location = {Oxford},
   article_number = {1},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eet004},
   keywords = {Geneva Convention relating to the Status of Refugees; exclusion clause; inclusion clause; Qualification Directive; Procedures Directive; Court of Justice},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0953-8186},
   journal = {International journal of refugee law},
   title = {Inclusion before Exclusion or Vice Versa: What the Qualification Directive and the Court of Justice Do (Not) Say},
   volume = {25},
   year = {2013}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 992804
AU  - Kosař, David
PY  - 2013
TI  - Inclusion before Exclusion or Vice Versa: What the Qualification Directive and the Court of Justice Do (Not) Say
JF  - International journal of refugee law
VL  - 25
IS  - 1
SP  - 87-119
EP  - 87-119
PB  - Oxford University Press
SN  - 09538186
KW  - Geneva Convention relating to the Status of Refugees
KW  - exclusion clause
KW  - inclusion clause
KW  - Qualification Directive
KW  - Procedures Directive
KW  - Court of Justice
N2  - The question whether the assessment of the inclusion clause must precede the application of the exclusion clauses under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (CSR51) is a recurring theme in many jurisdictions. This article shows that the jurisprudence of the top national courts shifted decisively in favour of the ‘exclusion before inclusion’ position. Subsequently, this article looks for guidance at the Qualification and Procedures Directives. It claims that although it is generally assumed that the European Asylum Acquis left this issue untouched, it endorses the ‘exclusion before inclusion’ position and it does so even more overtly than the CSR51. However, this article also puts forth the argument that the Qualification Directive taken in conjunction with the Procedures Directive creates an obligation for the EU Member States that goes beyond the CSR51, namely to address inclusion in the interview with the applicant even in cases when the refugee adjudicators plan to apply the exclusion clause.
ER  -

KOSAŘ, David. Inclusion before Exclusion or Vice Versa: What the Qualification Directive and the Court of Justice Do (Not) Say. \textit{International journal of refugee law}. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, roč.~25, č.~1, s.~87-119. ISSN~0953-8186. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eet004.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci