Comparison of the Accuracy of Bibliographical References
Generated for Medical Citation Styles by EndNote, Mendeley,
RefWorks and Zotero

J 2017

Comparison of the Accuracy of Bibliographical References Generated for Medical Citation Styles by EndNote, Mendeley, RefWorks and Zotero

KRATOCHVÍL, Jiří

Základní údaje

Originální název

Comparison of the Accuracy of Bibliographical References Generated for Medical Citation Styles by EndNote, Mendeley, RefWorks and Zotero

Název česky

Srovnání správnosti bibliografických citací vygenerovaných pro lékařské citační styly citačními manažery EndNote, Mendeley, RefWorks a Zotero

Autoři

KRATOCHVÍL, Jiří

Vydání

The Journal of Academic Librarianship, New York, Elsevier, 2017, 0099-1333

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50804 Library science

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 1.459

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/17:00096080

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

Klíčová slova česky

správnost; bibliografické citace; citační manažery; citační styly; EndNote; lékařské časopisy; Mendeley; RefWorks; Zotero

Klíčová slova anglicky

accuracy; bibliographical references; citation styles; EndNote; medical journals; Mendeley; reference managers; RefWorks; Zotero

Štítky

EL OK

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 21. 3. 2018 13:25, Soňa Böhmová

Anotace

V originále

Bibliographical references to online and printed articles, books, contributions to edited books and web resources generated by EndNote, Mendeley, RefWorks and Zotero were compared with manually written references according to the citation instructions in 15 biomedical journals and the NLM citation style. The fewest mistakes were detected in references generated by Zotero for 11 journals and the NLM style, while the second fewest number of mistakes was found in Mendeley. The largest number of mistakes for 9 journals was found in references generated by EndNote and in the other 4 journals the largest number of mistakes was detected in RefWorks references. With regard to the individual types of resources, the lowest number of mistakes was shown by Zotero, while RefWorks had the greatest number of mistakes. All programs had problems especially with generating the URL and the date of access in the reference to online documents. It was also found that several mistakes were caused by technical limitations of the reference managers, while other mistakes originated due to incorrect setting of the citation styles. A comparison showed that Zotero and Mendeley are the most suitable managers.

Přiložené soubory

2017-01-31_clanek_repozitar.pdf Verze souboru

Citovat

KRATOCHVÍL, Jiří. Comparison of the Accuracy of Bibliographical References Generated for Medical Citation Styles by EndNote, Mendeley, RefWorks and Zotero. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. New York: Elsevier, 2017, roč. 43, č. 1, s. 57-66. ISSN 0099-1333. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.09.001.

@article{1370817,
   author = {Kratochvíl, Jiří},
   article_location = {New York},
   article_number = {1},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.09.001},
   keywords = {accuracy; bibliographical references; citation styles; EndNote; medical journals; Mendeley; reference managers; RefWorks; Zotero},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0099-1333},
   journal = {The Journal of Academic Librarianship},
   title = {Comparison of the Accuracy of Bibliographical References Generated for Medical Citation Styles by EndNote, Mendeley, RefWorks and Zotero},
   volume = {43},
   year = {2017}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1370817
AU  - Kratochvíl, Jiří
PY  - 2017
TI  - Comparison of the Accuracy of Bibliographical References Generated for Medical Citation Styles by EndNote, Mendeley, RefWorks and Zotero
JF  - The Journal of Academic Librarianship
VL  - 43
IS  - 1
SP  - 57-66
EP  - 57-66
PB  - Elsevier
SN  - 00991333
KW  - accuracy
KW  - bibliographical references
KW  - citation styles
KW  - EndNote
KW  - medical journals
KW  - Mendeley
KW  - reference managers
KW  - RefWorks
KW  - Zotero
N2  - Bibliographical references to online and printed articles, books, contributions to edited books and web resources generated by EndNote, Mendeley, RefWorks and Zotero were compared with manually written references according to the citation instructions in 15 biomedical journals and the NLM citation style. The fewest mistakes were detected in references generated by Zotero for 11 journals and the NLM style, while the second fewest number of mistakes was found in Mendeley. The largest number of mistakes for 9 journals was found in references generated by EndNote and in the other 4 journals the largest number of mistakes was detected in RefWorks references. With regard to the individual types of resources, the lowest number of mistakes was shown by Zotero, while RefWorks had the greatest number of mistakes. All programs had problems especially with generating the URL and the date of access in the reference to online documents. It was also found that several mistakes were caused by technical limitations of the reference managers, while other mistakes originated due to incorrect setting of the citation styles. A comparison showed that Zotero and Mendeley are the most suitable managers.
ER  -

KRATOCHVÍL, Jiří. Comparison of the Accuracy of Bibliographical References Generated for Medical Citation Styles by EndNote, Mendeley, RefWorks and Zotero. \textit{The Journal of Academic Librarianship}. New York: Elsevier, 2017, roč.~43, č.~1, s.~57-66. ISSN~0099-1333. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.09.001.

Přehled o publikaci