J 2015

Bevacizumab with FOLFIRI or XELIRI in the First-line Therapy of Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma: Results from Czech Observational Registry

KOCÁKOVÁ, Ilona; Bohuslav MELICHAR; Ivo KOCÁK; Zbyněk BORTLÍČEK; Tomáš BÜCHLER et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Bevacizumab with FOLFIRI or XELIRI in the First-line Therapy of Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma: Results from Czech Observational Registry

Autoři

KOCÁKOVÁ, Ilona; Bohuslav MELICHAR; Ivo KOCÁK; Zbyněk BORTLÍČEK; Tomáš BÜCHLER; Ladislav DUŠEK; Luboš PETRUŽELKA; Milan KOHOUTEK; Jana PRAUSOVÁ; Jindřich FÍNEK; Beatrice MOHELNIKOVA-DUCHONOVA a Rostislav VYZULA

Vydání

Anticancer Research, Athens, The International Institute of Anticancer Research, 2015, 0250-7005

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30200 3.2 Clinical medicine

Stát vydavatele

Řecko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 1.895

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/15:00083299

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

Bevacizumab; FOLFIRI; XELIRI; colorectal cancer

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 2. 7. 2015 14:59, Soňa Böhmová

Anotace

V originále

Aim: To retrospectively compare the efficacy of two irinotecan-based chemotherapy regimens combined with bevacizumab in first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients and Methods: The data of 558 patients with mCRC treated with first-line bevacizumab plus irinotecan-containing regimen were obtained from the national CORECT registry that collects data of all patients with mCRC treated with targeted-agents. The treatment outcomes of patients treated with bevacizumab plus irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (FOLFIRI) were compared to patients treated with bevacizumab plus irinotecan and capecitabine (XELIRI). Results: Among 4,312 patients with CRC treated with bevacizumab, only 13% (558) received irinotecan-based chemotherapy. No significant differences were observed in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival between FOLFIRI and XELIRI groups. Moreover, the toxicity of both regimens was also comparable. Conclusion: This retrospective analysis confirms the comparable activity of FOLFIRI and XELIRI regimens when combined with bevacizumab.