ŘIHÁČEK, Tomáš and Jan ROUBAL. The proportion of integrationists among Czech psychotherapists and counselors : A comparison of multiple criteria. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration. Washingotn, DC: APA, 2017, vol. 27, No 1, p. 13-22. ISSN 1053-0479. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/int0000069.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name The proportion of integrationists among Czech psychotherapists and counselors : A comparison of multiple criteria
Authors ŘIHÁČEK, Tomáš (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution) and Jan ROUBAL (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution).
Edition Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, Washingotn, DC, APA, 2017, 1053-0479.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 50100 5.1 Psychology and cognitive sciences
Country of publisher United States of America
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Impact factor Impact factor: 0.000 in 1999
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14230/17:00096746
Organization unit Faculty of Social Studies
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/int0000069
UT WoS 000423038800003
Keywords in English psychotherapy integration; eclecticism; operationalization; theoretical orientation; techniques
Tags rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Blanka Farkašová, učo 97333. Changed: 12/2/2019 15:03.
Abstract
A psychotherapist’s integrationism/eclecticism can be operationalized in different ways. Existing studies estimating the proportion of integrationists/eclectics typically utilized a single criterion, often yielding incomparable results. The goal of this study was to estimate the prevalence of integrationism/eclecticism using four different criteria based on psychotherapy training, self-identified theoretical orientation and the use of psychotherapy techniques. The analysis was based on questionnaire data obtained from N = 373 Czech psychotherapy and counseling practitioners in an online survey. The proportion of integrationists was estimated to be 21.7, 32.7, 87.7, and 98.9 percent, depending on the criterion used. Furthermore, the endorsement of several types of integration was estimated and the frequency of combinations of the main theoretical orientations was explored. The findings are discussed in the context of previous studies and emphasize the role of adequate operationalization of integrationism. The results suggest that while the self-rated theoretical orientation may reflect a practitioner’s professional identity and affiliation, measurement on the level of techniques may be more sensitive to the real-life integration of various orientations.
Links
MUNI/A/1007/2015, interní kód MUName: Intenzivní výzkum psychoterapeutického procesu
Investor: Masaryk University, Category A
PrintDisplayed: 28/7/2024 10:15